329

(Difference between revisions)

Current revision as of 16:09, 1 December 2006

This proposal has failed.

It is kept for historical purposes. See why it failed on the discussion page.

Proposed by Applejuicefool 10:32, 25 November 2006 (EST)

1. Voting on a proposal may not begin unless any lower-numbered proposals that may exist are eligible to be voted upon as well.

2. After voting has begun on a proposal, voting on that proposal must continue until both of the following conditions have been met:

Normal voting time periods for that proposal have expired, as set forth in other rules;
Voting has ended on all lower-numbered rules.

3. This rule takes precedence over other rules which deal with the timing of voting and of enacting rules.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-{{Proposed rule}}
+{{Failed proposal}}
 Proposed by [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 10:32, 25 November 2006 (EST)
-. A proposal may not be voted on until each lower-numbered proposal has received at least one vote.  The nature of that vote ("for", "against", "abstain", etc.) is unimportant.
+. Voting on a proposal may not begin unless any lower-numbered proposals that may exist are eligible to be voted upon as well.
-. A proposal may still be voted on as long as there are proposals with lower numbers still being voted on.
+. After voting has begun on a proposal, voting on that proposal must continue until both of the following conditions have been met:
+* Normal voting time periods for that proposal have expired, as set forth in other rules;
+* Voting has ended on all lower-numbered rules.
-. This rule takes precedence over rules [[303]] and [[313]].
+. This rule takes precedence over other rules which deal with the timing of voting and of enacting rules.