Talk:Judge Election1206
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) |
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) (→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations == | == Proposer's summary and declarations == | ||
To debate and vote for a Judge. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 14:08, 29 November 2006 (EST) | To debate and vote for a Judge. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 14:08, 29 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Per [[321]] a vote must be held on the first, if we are going to do the nomination thing, it has to be done soon. [[321]] doesn't provide for a multi-day vote like we do for proposals, and until that is addressed we will have to follow the rule as written. Someone will need to nominate someone soon. I nominated The Juice for the special election, so I would ask that somebody else make a nomination for this regular election. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 14:35, 30 November 2006 (EST) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
Revision as of 19:35, 30 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
To debate and vote for a Judge. --TomFoolery 14:08, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Per 321 a vote must be held on the first, if we are going to do the nomination thing, it has to be done soon. 321 doesn't provide for a multi-day vote like we do for proposals, and until that is addressed we will have to follow the rule as written. Someone will need to nominate someone soon. I nominated The Juice for the special election, so I would ask that somebody else make a nomination for this regular election. --TomFoolery 14:35, 30 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Nominations
