Talk:337
From Nomicapolis
(→Proposer's summary and declarations) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
== Proposer's summary and declarations == | == Proposer's summary and declarations == | ||
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=1 Proposer's summary] | [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=1 Proposer's summary] | ||
| - | Alright this was a major change from the previous proposal, but still in line with the old. Regarding inactive players and their privledges. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 14:37, 29 November 2006 (EST) | + | Alright this was a major change from the previous proposal, but still in line with the old. Regarding inactive players and their privledges. Debate will end for this proposal at a later date and time. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 14:37, 29 November 2006 (EST) |
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
Revision as of 19:39, 29 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer's summary Alright this was a major change from the previous proposal, but still in line with the old. Regarding inactive players and their privledges. Debate will end for this proposal at a later date and time. --Dayd 14:37, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Add comments I would like to see instead an amendment to 314 limiting inactive players to 1 proposal, with the proviso that making a proposal does NOT remove a player from the inactive list. That way, if they make a proposal, while they're inactive, they still have to suck up their 1/2 vote, whether it's their proposal or not. That way the game can restart if everyone goes inactive. Applejuicefool 00:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Couldn't we do away with the 1/2 vote thing since an inactive player is losing points for inactivity. What if a player could resume active status by proposing a new amendment. --Tucana25 02:25, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Then inactive would be no change in status, except for the loss of 10 points. Applejuicefool 07:50, 28 November 2006 (EST)
The change of status would be that an inactive player could not vote at all until making a proposal.--Tucana25 09:05, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Oh, you mean that making a proposal would be the ONLY way back from inactivity. I don't think that's a good idea...if you start forcing people to make proposals, you end up with trash proposals ("The name of the game is now no longer Nomicapolis, but 'Bob.' All proposals must begin with the phrase 'Hail, Bob!'") Applejuicefool 09:28, 28 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
