Talk:324
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
(→For) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
| - | |||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
Revision as of 20:18, 25 November 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This rule will prevent abuse of rules. It is also a conerstone in real life legislation.--Shivan 12:12, 23 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Quick question: Is this up for vote already? Look at 303 and 313. The way I read em, 303 requires 3 days of debate unless the proposer declares an early end to the debate. 313 says the debate will last at least 24 hours. So since 303 takes precedence (c.f. 210), we need to wait 3 days unless Shivan cuts it short. Is my reasoning faulty? Applejuicefool 14:38, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
