Talk:309

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
Line 2: Line 2:
This is the discussion page for a current mutable rule. Its vote archive can be found at this location: [[Talk:311/vote-archive-1]]
This is the discussion page for a current mutable rule. Its vote archive can be found at this location: [[Talk:311/vote-archive-1]]
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
-
 
-
<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
 
-
== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
 
-
This is our first step in getting rid of the double rules that were created by accident in the beginning (Rules [[104]] and [[105]]. As per rule [[103]] immutable rules cannot be repealed but they can be turned into mutable rules with unanimous consent. Once this rule becomes mutable we can repeal it. Let's open this proposal for voting right away.
 
-
 
-
== Debate ==
 
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
 
-
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
 
-
 
-
My mistake, a simple copy / paste error. Oh well. [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 21:16, 16 April 2006 (PDT)
 
-
:Was there a rule that got left out (either [[104]] or [[105]] that should have read something else)? Is it something we need to get added? Maybe we need an amendment rather than a repeal of [[105]] after it becomes mutable... [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 07:10, 17 April 2006 (PDT)
 
-
:: The rules was supposed to read '''Any registered user may propose a rule-change and is an eligible voter.''' Rule [[302]] covers all the points that '''105''' was supposed to have. See this [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title=Current_ruleset&diff=1651&oldid=1633 diff] for the rule as it was. The reason why it is not a rule, is that the specific text did not have its own page. And by the time that I [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title=Talk%3A302&diff=1652&oldid=1640 realized] my boo-boo it was moot. I suggest that an eventual repeal of '''105''' would be best along with, if needed an amendment to and transmutation of [[302]]. [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 10:40, 17 April 2006 (PDT)
 
-
 
-
<!--END DEBATE-->
 
-
 
-
== Vote ==
 
-
=== For ===
 
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
 
-
# [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 19:50, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
 
-
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 22:30, 15 April 2006 (PDT)
 
-
# [[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 21:17, 16 April 2006 (PDT)
 
-
# [[User:Pugrins|Pugrins]] 16:50, 9 May 2006 (PDT)
 
-
 
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 
-
 
-
=== Against ===
 
-
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
 
-
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
 
-
 
-
__NOEDITSECTION__
 

Revision as of 20:52, 29 October 2006

This is the discussion page for a current mutable rule. Its vote archive can be found at this location: Talk:311/vote-archive-1

Personal tools