User talk:Mike Rosoft - Revision history

Tucana25 at 20:28, 18 December 2006

Tucana25 — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 20:28:25 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 18 December 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	In regards to your questionon [[356]]. You do know that [[344]] failed. Therefore using [[344]] as an example is a little of moot point. Also [[111]] implies that a rule should only do one particular thing at a time. However all that would be needed in [[344]] would have been a clause which made it exempt from [[356]] ergo problem solved. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 09:29, 18 December 2006 (EST)		In regards to your questionon [[356]]. You do know that [[344]] failed. Therefore using [[344]] as an example is a little of moot point. Also [[111]] implies that a rule should only do one particular thing at a time. However all that would be needed in [[344]] would have been a clause which made it exempt from [[356]] ergo problem solved. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 09:29, 18 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Rule [[111]] actually just says that if a rule references more than one rule, that is grounds for debate. There is no rule preventing it. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 15:28, 18 December 2006 (EST)

Dayd — Mon, 18 Dec 2006 14:29:13 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 18 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Indeed...greetings. I hope that your time here is adequate. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 20:41, 7 December 2006 (EST)		Indeed...greetings. I hope that your time here is adequate. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 20:41, 7 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	In regards to your questionon [[356]]. You do know that [[344]] failed. Therefore using [[344]] as an example is a little of moot point. Also [[111]] implies that a rule should only do one particular thing at a time. However all that would be needed in [[344]] would have been a clause which made it exempt from [[356]] ergo problem solved. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 09:29, 18 December 2006 (EST)

Tucana25 — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 01:41:28 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:41, 8 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Welcome to the game, Mike! I hope you have a great time here. --[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 19:38, 7 December 2006 (EST)		Welcome to the game, Mike! I hope you have a great time here. --[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 19:38, 7 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Indeed...greetings. I hope that your time here is adequate. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 20:41, 7 December 2006 (EST)

Simulacrum — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:38:49 GMT

New page

Welcome to the game, Mike! I hope you have a great time here. --[[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 19:38, 7 December 2006 (EST)