Talk:336 - Revision history

Simulacrum: /* For */ fixed boo-boo

Simulacrum — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:52:20 GMT

For: fixed boo-boo

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:52, 30 November 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
	# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)
-	~~# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->~~
	# --[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 01:51, 30 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 01:51, 30 November 2006 (EST)
		+	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Simulacrum: /* For */

Simulacrum — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 06:51:41 GMT

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:51, 30 November 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+	# --[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 01:51, 30 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Shivan: /* For */

Shivan — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:07:31 GMT

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 30 November 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
		+	# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Shivan: /* Debate */

Shivan — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 05:07:02 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 30 November 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)		Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
	:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>		:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>
-	I corrected it now. Sorry for the misspell, the SP was needed ( :--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 16:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)	+	I corrected it now. Sorry for the misspell, the SP was needed ( :--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 16:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>
		+	No other comments it seems. "Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on." --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Shivan: /* Debate */

Shivan — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 21:10:34 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 28 November 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)		Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
-	:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)	+	:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>
		+	I corrected it now. Sorry for the misspell, the SP was needed ( :--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 16:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

Applejuicefool — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:23:11 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:23, 28 November 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:

	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)		Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
		+	:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Simulacrum at 09:09, 28 November 2006

Simulacrum — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:09:55 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 28 November 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	Oops! Sorry, I missed that line. Looks good to me. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:34, 28 November 2006 (EST)		Oops! Sorry, I missed that line. Looks good to me. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:34, 28 November 2006 (EST)

-	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] ~~{{subst~~:~~CURRENTTIME}}~~, ~~{{subst:CURRENTDAY}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}}~~ {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)	+	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Simulacrum: /* Debate */

Simulacrum — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:09:48 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:09, 28 November 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Oops! Sorry, I missed that line. Looks good to me. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:34, 28 November 2006 (EST)		Oops! Sorry, I missed that line. Looks good to me. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:34, 28 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] {{subst:CURRENTTIME}}, {{subst:CURRENTDAY}} {{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Simulacrum: remove instruction tag

Simulacrum — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 09:07:39 GMT

remove instruction tag

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:07, 28 November 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->~~
-	Please substitute this template. To do so add '''subst:''' in the template call. This is how it should look typed: <big><nowiki>{{</nowiki>subst:vote<nowiki>}}</nowiki></big> <br /> When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
-	~~<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->~~
-
	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->		<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==		== Proposer's summary and declarations ==

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

Applejuicefool — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 05:34:52 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:34, 28 November 2006
Line 13:		Line 13:
	But this is specifically mentioned in the rule:		But this is specifically mentioned in the rule:
	"In a vote in which there are more than two options (for example, when there is an election for a title and there are three candidates running), the option which recieves the greatest number of FOR votes will win.""--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:18, 28 November 2006 (EST)		"In a vote in which there are more than two options (for example, when there is an election for a title and there are three candidates running), the option which recieves the greatest number of FOR votes will win.""--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:18, 28 November 2006 (EST)
		+
	Oops! Sorry, I missed that line. Looks good to me. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:34, 28 November 2006 (EST)		Oops! Sorry, I missed that line. Looks good to me. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:34, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:07, 30 November 2006
Line 14:		Line 14:
	Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)		Sorry I am having trouble understanding the unaminous provision of this proposal could the proposer please clarify? -- [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 09:09, 28 November {{CURRENTYEAR}} (UTC)
	:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>		:"Unaminous consent shall be defined as no votes not having any AGAINST votes." As Sim points out, this sentence is not grammatically correct. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 09:23, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>
-	I corrected it now. Sorry for the misspell, the SP was needed ( :--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 16:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)	+	I corrected it now. Sorry for the misspell, the SP was needed ( :--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 16:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)<br><br>
		+	No other comments it seems. "Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on." --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 00:07, 30 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->