Talk:320 - Revision history

Applejuicefool: /* Against */

Applejuicefool — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:24:43 GMT

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 24 November 2006
Line 38:		Line 38:
	# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 10:05, 23 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 10:05, 23 November 2006 (EST)
	# --[[User:Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 12:31, 23 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 12:31, 23 November 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST) (Having one person making all the proposals will at least slow the game down and at best create a possibility of abuse).
	__NOEDITSECTION__		__NOEDITSECTION__

Dayd: /* For */

Dayd — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 01:21:04 GMT

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:21, 24 November 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 20:21, 23 November 2006 (EST)
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Tom Foolery: /* Against */

Tom Foolery — Thu, 23 Nov 2006 17:16:15 GMT

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:16, 23 November 2006
Line 36:		Line 36:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
	# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 10:05, 23 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 10:05, 23 November 2006 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 12:31, 23 November 2006 (EST)
	__NOEDITSECTION__		__NOEDITSECTION__

Shivan: /* Against */

Shivan — Thu, 23 Nov 2006 15:05:17 GMT

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:05, 23 November 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
-	#	+	# --[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 10:05, 23 November 2006 (EST)
	__NOEDITSECTION__		__NOEDITSECTION__

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */ sig

Applejuicefool — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:36:33 GMT

Debate: sig

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 18 November 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:31, 18 November 2006 (EST)		:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:31, 18 November 2006 (EST)

-	:But "2/3 majority vote" is not defined, and it's not self-explanatory. If we get another person on here who, like me, is picky about words - and is not as ethical as I am :) - they might argue that "2/3 majority" means 2/3 of a majority. And Dictionary.com defines "majority" as "a number of voters or votes, jurors, or others in agreement, constituting more than half of the total number." Also, what is the point of having terms defined as in [[310]], if we're not going to use those definitions because they might change? [[User:~~70.177.25.135~~\|~~70.177.25.135~~]] 14:35, 18 November 2006 (EST)	+	:But "2/3 majority vote" is not defined, and it's not self-explanatory. If we get another person on here who, like me, is picky about words - and is not as ethical as I am :) - they might argue that "2/3 majority" means 2/3 of a majority. And Dictionary.com defines "majority" as "a number of voters or votes, jurors, or others in agreement, constituting more than half of the total number." Also, what is the point of having terms defined as in [[310]], if we're not going to use those definitions because they might change? [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 14:36, 18 November 2006 (EST)
-		+
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

70.177.25.135: /* Debate */

70.177.25.135 — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 19:35:11 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:35, 18 November 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:31, 18 November 2006 (EST)		:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:31, 18 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	:But "2/3 majority vote" is not defined, and it's not self-explanatory. If we get another person on here who, like me, is picky about words - and is not as ethical as I am :) - they might argue that "2/3 majority" means 2/3 of a majority. And Dictionary.com defines "majority" as "a number of voters or votes, jurors, or others in agreement, constituting more than half of the total number." Also, what is the point of having terms defined as in [[310]], if we're not going to use those definitions because they might change? [[User:70.177.25.135\|70.177.25.135]] 14:35, 18 November 2006 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd at 15:41, 18 November 2006

Dayd — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:41:31 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:41, 18 November 2006
Line 12:		Line 12:
	As written it would be the Mayor's resposiblity to create the Proposals, and to create the appropriate wiki pages, therefore putting in Proposed by (Player). The Mayor could claim all the Proposals for himself, but I doubt the player would be in office long.		As written it would be the Mayor's resposiblity to create the Proposals, and to create the appropriate wiki pages, therefore putting in Proposed by (Player). The Mayor could claim all the Proposals for himself, but I doubt the player would be in office long.

		+	Yes you need a supermajority to kick out the Mayor. I did not say supermajority as that term may change and I wanted it to be 2/3 majority vote. Meaning the majority must be two thirds. And for the record a "Simple majority" is defined as 50% not just a majority.
	== Debate ==		== Debate ==
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]

Dayd at 15:34, 18 November 2006

Dayd — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:34:13 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 18 November 2006
Line 9:		Line 9:

	I am thinking that the elections themselves would be on a totally different page. Like a [[Mayor\|Mayor of Nomicapolis]] Page or something. With the actual player listed on the Article and the votes on the Talk page.		I am thinking that the elections themselves would be on a totally different page. Like a [[Mayor\|Mayor of Nomicapolis]] Page or something. With the actual player listed on the Article and the votes on the Talk page.
		+
		+	As written it would be the Mayor's resposiblity to create the Proposals, and to create the appropriate wiki pages, therefore putting in Proposed by (Player). The Mayor could claim all the Proposals for himself, but I doubt the player would be in office long.

	== Debate ==		== Debate ==

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

Applejuicefool — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:31:51 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 18 November 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:
	:So nobody other than the mayor would be able to introduce proposals? So if the "10 points for a successful proposal" proposal passes, then only the mayor will see those points? Or do you mean something else when you say "introduce"? For instance, I make a proposal, and the mayor types a little introduction section, giving his thoughts on the subject? [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:24, 18 November 2006 (EST)		:So nobody other than the mayor would be able to introduce proposals? So if the "10 points for a successful proposal" proposal passes, then only the mayor will see those points? Or do you mean something else when you say "introduce"? For instance, I make a proposal, and the mayor types a little introduction section, giving his thoughts on the subject? [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:24, 18 November 2006 (EST)

-	:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]].	+	:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:31, 18 November 2006 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

Applejuicefool — Sat, 18 Nov 2006 15:31:23 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 18 November 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:So nobody other than the mayor would be able to introduce proposals? So if the "10 points for a successful proposal" proposal passes, then only the mayor will see those points? Or do you mean something else when you say "introduce"? For instance, I make a proposal, and the mayor types a little introduction section, giving his thoughts on the subject? [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:24, 18 November 2006 (EST)		:So nobody other than the mayor would be able to introduce proposals? So if the "10 points for a successful proposal" proposal passes, then only the mayor will see those points? Or do you mean something else when you say "introduce"? For instance, I make a proposal, and the mayor types a little introduction section, giving his thoughts on the subject? [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:24, 18 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	:Also, just to be picky, by "2/3 majority vote" do you mean that more than 1/3 of the voters must agree to kick the mayor out? We have defined "majority" as more than 50% of the vote, so a 2/3 majority would be 2/3 of 50%, which is 1/3. Incidentally, we have also defined the term "supermajority" as more than 66% of the vote. Take a gander at [[310]].

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->