Talk:321 - Revision history

Wooble: repeal info

2007-05-10T15:39:36Z

repeal info

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 10 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	This rule was repealed by rule [[385]].
		+
	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->

Tucana25: /* Debate */

2006-11-29T04:08:10Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 29 November 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)		The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)
-
-	Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted." That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed. I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Tucana25: /* Debate */

2006-11-29T04:06:35Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:06, 29 November 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)		The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted." That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed. I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

TomFoolery: /* For */

2006-11-24T03:12:35Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:12, 24 November 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:
	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)
	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 21:57, 23 November 2006 (EST); (Good rule. There will need to be some precedents set, such as how the judge decides what constitutes a "problem").		# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 21:57, 23 November 2006 (EST); (Good rule. There will need to be some precedents set, such as how the judge decides what constitutes a "problem").
		+	# --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 22:28, 23 November 2006 (EST)

	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Applejuicefool: /* For */

2006-11-24T02:57:26Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 24 November 2006
Line 23:		Line 23:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 21:57, 23 November 2006 (EST); (Good rule. There will need to be some precedents set, such as how the judge decides what constitutes a "problem").

	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Dayd: /* For */

2006-11-24T01:24:03Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 01:24, 24 November 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 20:24, 23 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Tom Foolery: /* Debate */

2006-11-22T22:13:06Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 22 November 2006
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Well that is part of the reason behind these proposals. One is that we do need a Judge reguardless of what anyone may claim there will be situations that arise that will require some to officate. I am baffled how anyone manage to convince anyone that a Judge is not a required position. As for the Mayor that is to just make the game more interesting. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:51, 20 November 2006 (EST)		Well that is part of the reason behind these proposals. One is that we do need a Judge reguardless of what anyone may claim there will be situations that arise that will require some to officate. I am baffled how anyone manage to convince anyone that a Judge is not a required position. As for the Mayor that is to just make the game more interesting. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:51, 20 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	The idea of a Judge is a good one, but with the limited number of active players it may be wise to amend the voting periodicity pending some future larger number of actives. --[[User: Tom Foolery\|Tom Foolery]] 17:27, 22 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd: /* Debate */

2006-11-21T02:51:46Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:51, 21 November 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
		+
	I think with both of the office suggestions, we are too few players. Almost half of the players will have an office, and have a lot of power. I think we should be more players before it is passed.--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 13:13, 20 November 2006 (EST)		I think with both of the office suggestions, we are too few players. Almost half of the players will have an office, and have a lot of power. I think we should be more players before it is passed.--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 13:13, 20 November 2006 (EST)

		+	Well that is part of the reason behind these proposals. One is that we do need a Judge reguardless of what anyone may claim there will be situations that arise that will require some to officate. I am baffled how anyone manage to convince anyone that a Judge is not a required position. As for the Mayor that is to just make the game more interesting. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:51, 20 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd: /* Debate */

2006-11-21T02:46:01Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:46, 21 November 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
		+	I think with both of the office suggestions, we are too few players. Almost half of the players will have an office, and have a lot of power. I think we should be more players before it is passed.--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 13:13, 20 November 2006 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd at 03:11, 18 November 2006

2006-11-18T03:11:45Z

New page

== Proposer's summary and declarations ==

This is to create an elected position of Judge. The Judge will be in charge of any rule disputes that may arise.

== Debate ==
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]




== Vote ==
=== For ===
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
# 

<br />

=== Against ===
[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
#
__NOEDITSECTION__