Talk:Main Page - Revision history

DCJoeDog: /* Logging In */

2007-10-24T15:16:59Z

Logging In

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:16, 24 October 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)		* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
	** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)		** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	It seems someone made anon login possible again, and guess what, vandals hit the site again, so I made it the way it was. do NOT change it without discussing it first. I know I am not the only admin here so talk about it here first. My argument is that is it controls the vandals, which it seems is true.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 11:16, 24 October 2007 (EDT)

	== Screen width guidelines ==		== Screen width guidelines ==

2007-10-24T15:11:03Z

Reverted edit of 202.70.201.34, changed back to last version by Silent1

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 24 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~notroc~~
	== Tables ==		== Tables ==
	It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences--[[User:Silent1\|Silent1]] 22:16, 22 October 2007 (EDT)		It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences--[[User:Silent1\|Silent1]] 22:16, 22 October 2007 (EDT)

2007-10-24T14:21:58Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:21, 24 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	notroc
	== Tables ==		== Tables ==
	It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences--[[User:Silent1\|Silent1]] 22:16, 22 October 2007 (EDT)		It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences--[[User:Silent1\|Silent1]] 22:16, 22 October 2007 (EDT)

2007-10-23T02:16:18Z

Tables

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:16, 23 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Tables ==		== Tables ==
-	It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences	+	It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences--[[User:Silent1\|Silent1]] 22:16, 22 October 2007 (EDT)



-	===Logging In ==	+	==Logging In ==

	Is it worth forcing people to register and log in to make changes?		Is it worth forcing people to register and log in to make changes?

2007-10-23T02:15:35Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 23 October 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== Tables ==
		+	It would appear that this wiki doesn't support the wiki format for tables, if there are more than 12 rows. This is an issue when updating things like Stone Wall Defences
		+
		+
		+
		+	===Logging In ==
		+
	Is it worth forcing people to register and log in to make changes?		Is it worth forcing people to register and log in to make changes?

2007-10-17T23:43:50Z

Screen width guidelines

←Older revision		Revision as of 23:43, 17 October 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:

	Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons? Pages like the [[Gold Mine]] run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so. This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully. Do we care? If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --[[User:Headphones\|Headphones]] 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)		Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons? Pages like the [[Gold Mine]] run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so. This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully. Do we care? If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --[[User:Headphones\|Headphones]] 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
		+	* Yeah, you got me on that one as well, I see what you mean, although I don't know anyone who uses a resolution lower than 1024 these days, so it may not be as big a deal as you may think--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 19:43, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

2007-10-17T19:24:14Z

Screen width guidelines

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:24, 17 October 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)		* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
	** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)		** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Screen width guidelines ==
		+
		+	Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons? Pages like the [[Gold Mine]] run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so. This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully. Do we care? If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --[[User:Headphones\|Headphones]] 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

2007-09-07T18:59:16Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 7 September 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:

	* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)		* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
		+	** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)

2007-08-26T22:00:06Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:00, 26 August 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	It would be a pain, but seems like it has become necessary with all the little kids on the net these days.		It would be a pain, but seems like it has become necessary with all the little kids on the net these days.

-	You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)	+	* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)

2007-08-26T21:59:10Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 26 August 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It would be a pain, but seems like it has become necessary with all the little kids on the net these days.		It would be a pain, but seems like it has become necessary with all the little kids on the net these days.
		+
		+	You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious\|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)