CW9-1943
From Environmental Technology
Jalcst-1943  (Talk | contribs)  | 
		 (graded)  | 
		||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | 1.  Some common disadvantages are:    | + | {{Graded}}  | 
| + | |||
| + | 1.  Some common disadvantages are: {{OK}}  | ||
* ELECTRICITY- technology is limited, higher vehicle cost-lower vehicle range or performance,  less convient refueling.     | * ELECTRICITY- technology is limited, higher vehicle cost-lower vehicle range or performance,  less convient refueling.     | ||
| Line 9: | Line 11: | ||
| - | 2.  It looks like- Very Low Emissions of ozone-forming hydrocarbons and toxics.  | + | 2.  It looks like- Very Low Emissions of ozone-forming hydrocarbons and toxics. {{OK}}  | 
| - | 3.  I dont know what feasible means.  But in my opinion the article does explain in great detail the advantages and disadvantages of using clean fuels.  If a person was wanting to look into switching to clean fuels this article would more than likely give them a little of the information they need.  | + | 3.  I dont know what feasible means.  But in my opinion the article does explain in great detail the advantages and disadvantages of using clean fuels.  If a person was wanting to look into switching to clean fuels this article would more than likely give them a little of the information they need. {{OK}}  | 
| - | 4. Well here goes nothing:  | + | 4. Well here goes nothing: {{OK}}  | 
*1) ELECTRICITY-N/A  | *1) ELECTRICITY-N/A  | ||
| Line 24: | Line 26: | ||
| - | 5.  Gasoline, No.2 Diesel, and BIO-Diesel.  But gasoline is the main one.  | + | 5.  Gasoline, No.2 Diesel, and BIO-Diesel.  But gasoline is the main one. {{OK}}  | 
| - | 6.  Energy content from least to greatest:  | + | 6.  Energy content from least to greatest: {{OK}}  | 
*Electicity- N/A  | *Electicity- N/A  | ||
| Line 40: | Line 42: | ||
| - | 7.  Gasoline and Bio-Diesel seem to be the safest, after all we have used them for centurys.  | + | 7.  Gasoline and Bio-Diesel seem to be the safest, after all we have used them for centurys. {{OK}}  | 
| - | 8.  Well, I would say its true since it is on the U.S. Department of Energy official website.  I dont think they would put somethign inaccurate and untrue on here.  But i suppose if you wanted to find out wether its true or not you could write them and have them send you a copy or maybe send an email because most of the time you get a quicker response and its just as accurate as a piece of paper.  | + | 8.  Well, I would say its true since it is on the U.S. Department of Energy official website.  I dont think they would put somethign inaccurate and untrue on here.  But i suppose if you wanted to find out wether its true or not you could write them and have them send you a copy or maybe send an email because most of the time you get a quicker response and its just as accurate as a piece of paper. {{OK}}  | 
Current revision as of 17:57, 28 April 2006
| 
                 G  | 
        
1.  Some common disadvantages are: 
| OK | 
- ELECTRICITY- technology is limited, higher vehicle cost-lower vehicle range or performance, less convient refueling.
 - ETHANOL- High fuel cost, somewhat lower vehicle range.
 - METHANOL- Fuel could be imported, lower vehicle range.
 - NATURAL GAS (METHANE)- Higher vehicle cost, lower vehicle range, and less convient refueling.
 - PROPANE- cosst will rise with demand, limited supply, no energy security or trade balance benefits.
 - REFORMULATED GASOLINE- higher fuel costs, few energy security or trade balance benefits.
 
2.  It looks like- Very Low Emissions of ozone-forming hydrocarbons and toxics. 
| OK | 
3. I dont know what feasible means. But in my opinion the article does explain in great detail the advantages and disadvantages of using clean fuels. If a person was wanting to look into switching to clean fuels this article would more than likely give them a little of the information they need.
| OK | 
4. Well here goes nothing:
| OK | 
- 1) ELECTRICITY-N/A
 - 2) NO.2 DIESEL-8 TO 15
 - 3) BIODIESEL-25
 - 4) ETHANOL AND METHANOL-100
 - 5) LIQUIFIED PETROLEUM-104
 - 6) LIQUIFIED NATURAL GAS AND COMPRESSED NATURAL GAS-120+
 - 7) HYDROGEN-130+
 
5.  Gasoline, No.2 Diesel, and BIO-Diesel.  But gasoline is the main one. 
| OK | 
6. Energy content from least to greatest:
| OK | 
- Electicity- N/A
 - Hydrogen-3000 BTU
 - CNG- 33000 BTU
 - Methanol- 56000 BTU
 - LNG- 73500 BTU
 - Ethanol- 80000 BTU
 - LPG- 84000 BTU
 - Gasoline-109000 BTU
 - Biodiesel-117000 BTU
 - No.2 diesel-128000 BTU
 
7.  Gasoline and Bio-Diesel seem to be the safest, after all we have used them for centurys. 
| OK | 
8. Well, I would say its true since it is on the U.S. Department of Energy official website. I dont think they would put somethign inaccurate and untrue on here. But i suppose if you wanted to find out wether its true or not you could write them and have them send you a copy or maybe send an email because most of the time you get a quicker response and its just as accurate as a piece of paper.
| OK | 
