Editing CW6-1219

From Environmental Technology

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Current revision Your text
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{Graded}}
+
'''HURRICANES V.S. HOMES: SHOULD BUILDING ON U.S. COASTS BE STOPPED?'''
-
 
+
-
 
+
-
'''HURRICANES V.S. HOMES: SHOULD BUILDING ON U.S. COASTS BE STOPPED?''' {{OK}}
+
MY ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS NO! I UNDERSTAND THE VIEW OF THE ARTICLE THAT THE RECENT SEVERE HURRICANES THERE HAVE POSED A THREAT AND BUILDING THERE IS DANGEROUS HOWEVER, EVERYONE, WORLDWIDE IS AWARE OF THIS DANGER ON THE COAST AND IF THEY WANT TO BUILD A HOUSE THERE LET THEM. IT IS A BEAUTIFUL PLACE A POPULAR TOURIST LOCATION, AND A GREAT VACATION SPOT. A BAN ON BUILDING COULD EFFECT THE POPULATION OF THE COASTLINE CITIES THEREFORE THE SCHOOLS, BUSINESSES AND REAL ESTATE WOULD SUFFER.
MY ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION IS NO! I UNDERSTAND THE VIEW OF THE ARTICLE THAT THE RECENT SEVERE HURRICANES THERE HAVE POSED A THREAT AND BUILDING THERE IS DANGEROUS HOWEVER, EVERYONE, WORLDWIDE IS AWARE OF THIS DANGER ON THE COAST AND IF THEY WANT TO BUILD A HOUSE THERE LET THEM. IT IS A BEAUTIFUL PLACE A POPULAR TOURIST LOCATION, AND A GREAT VACATION SPOT. A BAN ON BUILDING COULD EFFECT THE POPULATION OF THE COASTLINE CITIES THEREFORE THE SCHOOLS, BUSINESSES AND REAL ESTATE WOULD SUFFER.
-
'''CHINA MAKES STABLE ENERGY SUPPLIES TOP PRIORITY FOR ECONOMIC PLANNING''' {{OK}}
+
'''CHINA MAKES STABLE ENERGY SUPPLIES TOP PRIORITY FOR ECONOMIC PLANNING'''
I THINK THE ARTICLE HAS SOME REALLY GOOD IDEAS HOWEVER ONE IDEA THAT STRUCK ME AS INTERESTING WAS THE FACT THAT SOMEONE HAD THE IDEA TO PUT HARMUL POLLUTANTS IN THE GROUND. THAT SEEMS A LITTLE FAR FETCHED TO ME BECAUSE WE REALLY DONT KNOW IF THAT POSES ANY DANGERS A MORE STABLE ENERGY SUPPLY BUT IS STORING HARMFUL POLLUTANTS UNDERGROUND ETHICAL AND SAFE TO THE ENVIRONMENT?
I THINK THE ARTICLE HAS SOME REALLY GOOD IDEAS HOWEVER ONE IDEA THAT STRUCK ME AS INTERESTING WAS THE FACT THAT SOMEONE HAD THE IDEA TO PUT HARMUL POLLUTANTS IN THE GROUND. THAT SEEMS A LITTLE FAR FETCHED TO ME BECAUSE WE REALLY DONT KNOW IF THAT POSES ANY DANGERS A MORE STABLE ENERGY SUPPLY BUT IS STORING HARMFUL POLLUTANTS UNDERGROUND ETHICAL AND SAFE TO THE ENVIRONMENT?

Please note that all contributions to Environmental Technology may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then don't submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Project:Copyrights for details). DO NOT SUBMIT COPYRIGHTED WORK WITHOUT PERMISSION!


Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
Personal tools