Talk:Main Page - Revision history

Ac1983fan: Suggestion

Ac1983fan — Fri, 27 Oct 2006 11:59:35 GMT

Suggestion

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:59, 27 October 2006
Line 28:		Line 28:
	:I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT)		:I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT)
	::I agree that the "two wiki's are way too many" concept isn't really a good thing. I think there can be plenty of wikis. The people who manage a wiki can end up making or breaking a wiki so there's no need to rely on just one. It's like natural selection, the one that's best suited will thrive. As for heroeswiki being Wikipedia content cut and pasted it was like that originally, but a lot of the Wikipedia content was rewritten so most of it is new now. -[[User:Stealth\|Stealth]] 10:20, 25 October 2006 (EDT)		::I agree that the "two wiki's are way too many" concept isn't really a good thing. I think there can be plenty of wikis. The people who manage a wiki can end up making or breaking a wiki so there's no need to rely on just one. It's like natural selection, the one that's best suited will thrive. As for heroeswiki being Wikipedia content cut and pasted it was like that originally, but a lot of the Wikipedia content was rewritten so most of it is new now. -[[User:Stealth\|Stealth]] 10:20, 25 October 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Suggestion ==
		+
		+	The main page should really be protected, to prevent vandalism.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 07:59, 27 October 2006 (EDT)

Stealth: /* Crap... */

Stealth — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:20:49 GMT

Crap...

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:20, 25 October 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli		Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli
	:I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT)		:I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT)
		+	::I agree that the "two wiki's are way too many" concept isn't really a good thing. I think there can be plenty of wikis. The people who manage a wiki can end up making or breaking a wiki so there's no need to rely on just one. It's like natural selection, the one that's best suited will thrive. As for heroeswiki being Wikipedia content cut and pasted it was like that originally, but a lot of the Wikipedia content was rewritten so most of it is new now. -[[User:Stealth\|Stealth]] 10:20, 25 October 2006 (EDT)

Ac1983fan: /* Crap... */

Ac1983fan — Wed, 25 Oct 2006 14:08:56 GMT

Crap...

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:08, 25 October 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:

	Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli		Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli
		+	:I say we don't. "Two wiki's are way to many" is bad thinking. Also, the heroeswiki is mostly just content from Wikipedia cut-and-pasted.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 10:08, 25 October 2006 (EDT)

Admin at 20:49, 24 October 2006

Admin — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:49:59 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 24 October 2006
Line 24:		Line 24:
	http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page		http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page
	It's a lot better than ours although I hadn't heard anything about it up until now so...I don't know why they'd be keeping it a secret for so long. What should we do? Contact them and maybe make a combination effort or something? I don't really want all our work to be in vain, but two wikis is one too many. --[[User:Sidney\|Sidney]] 16:31, 24 October 2006 (EDT)		It's a lot better than ours although I hadn't heard anything about it up until now so...I don't know why they'd be keeping it a secret for so long. What should we do? Contact them and maybe make a combination effort or something? I don't really want all our work to be in vain, but two wikis is one too many. --[[User:Sidney\|Sidney]] 16:31, 24 October 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	Go ahead. I'd rather see it stay here because we have more of a community rather than just one person but well see what they have to say. -- Vote Petrelli

Sidney: crap...

Sidney — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 20:31:53 GMT

crap...

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 24 October 2006
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:Well, I could work on the actor pages. Also, guys, make sure to sign your posts with <nowiki>~~</nowiki>~~.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 08:21, 24 October 2006 (EDT)		:Well, I could work on the actor pages. Also, guys, make sure to sign your posts with <nowiki>~~</nowiki>~~.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 08:21, 24 October 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Crap... ==
		+
		+	http://heroeswiki.com/index.php?title=Main_Page
		+	It's a lot better than ours although I hadn't heard anything about it up until now so...I don't know why they'd be keeping it a secret for so long. What should we do? Contact them and maybe make a combination effort or something? I don't really want all our work to be in vain, but two wikis is one too many. --[[User:Sidney\|Sidney]] 16:31, 24 October 2006 (EDT)

Ac1983fan: /* we should really */

Ac1983fan — Tue, 24 Oct 2006 12:21:50 GMT

we should really

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:21, 24 October 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	--Vote Petrelli		--Vote Petrelli
		+
		+	:Well, I could work on the actor pages. Also, guys, make sure to sign your posts with <nowiki>~~</nowiki>~~.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 08:21, 24 October 2006 (EDT)

Admin at 03:33, 21 October 2006

Admin — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 03:33:36 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:33, 21 October 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)		split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)
	--		--
		+
	I agree. We could have a seperate link on the main page for the actors, or we could use the character page in the following manner....		I agree. We could have a seperate link on the main page for the actors, or we could use the character page in the following manner....

Line 10:		Line 11:

	-maylith		-maylith
		+
		+	--
		+
		+	I don't want to do this ''unless'' we have enough information to constitute it. When someone created actor pages they were just one sentence. No reason to have a multitude of pages with one sentence and the filmography. Until then it can stay on the character page. Plus, that is kind of why there's a Table of Contents.
		+
		+	--Vote Petrelli

Maylith at 00:46, 21 October 2006

Maylith — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:46:00 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 21 October 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)		split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)
-		+	--
	I agree. We could have a seperate link on the main page for the actors, or we could use the character page in the following manner....		I agree. We could have a seperate link on the main page for the actors, or we could use the character page in the following manner....

	character name played by actor name		character name played by actor name
		+
		+	-maylith

Maylith at 00:45, 21 October 2006

Maylith — Sat, 21 Oct 2006 00:45:19 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:45, 21 October 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)		split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	I agree. We could have a seperate link on the main page for the actors, or we could use the character page in the following manner....
		+
		+	character name played by actor name

Ac1983fan: we should really

Ac1983fan — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 21:07:08 GMT

we should really

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 20 October 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Why are we using pics via a URl? we can jsut upload it here.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 11:48, 18 October 2006 (EDT)		Why are we using pics via a URl? we can jsut upload it here.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 11:48, 18 October 2006 (EDT)
		+
		+	== we should really ==
		+
		+	split up the character articles and the actor ones. It will get to messy having them together.--[[User:Ac1983fan\|Ac1983fan]] 17:07, 20 October 2006 (EDT)