From Diwygiad

Revision as of 17:52, 14 September 2011

Principi regolatori del canto dei salmi nel culto

Nella Bibbia esiste un certo numero di importanti dottrine che, pur senza appoggiarsi in modo conclusivo su uno o due versetti particolari, sono dedotte dalle Scritture.

La salmodia esclusiva fluisce direttamente dall'insegnamento complessivo delle Scritture al riguardo del culto che deve essere reso a Jahvè.

Exclusive Psalm singing is one such doctrine. Exclusive Psalmody flows directly from the overall teaching of Scripture regarding the worship of Jehovah. The Bible teaches that "the acceptable way of worshipping the true God is instituted by Himself, and so limited by His own revealed will, that He may not be worshipped according to the imaginations and devices of men, or the suggestions of Satan, under any visible representation, or any other way not prescribed in holy scripture."3 When it comes to the elements of worship and the content of praise, we must have a warrant from God’s word. God sets the parameters on what is permissible in worship, not man. In other words, anything that the church does in worship must be proved from the Bible. This proof can be attained by an explicit command of God (e.g., "Do this in remembrance of Me," Lk. 22:19); or by logical inference from Scripture (i.e., there may not be an explicit command, but when several passages are compared, they teach or infer a scriptural practice); or by biblical historical example (e.g., the change from the seventh day to the first day of the week for corporate public worship).

The Reformed doctrine of worship called "the scriptural law of worship"; "thePp puritan principle of worship"; or, "the regulative principle of worship" is clearly taught in both the Old and New Testaments. In Genesis 4:3-5 we read that God rejected Cain’s offering of the fruit of the ground, but accepted Abel’s offering of animal sacrifices. Why? Because even though offering fruit is not prohibited, it also was not commanded. Leviticus 10:1-2 records that God killed Nadab and Abihu because they offered strange fire, which God "commanded them not." The offering of strange fire is not prohibited in Scripture, but it also is not commanded. In Deuteronomy 12:32, in the specific context of avoiding false heathen worship practices, God said, "Whatever I command you, be careful to observe it; you shall not add to it nor take away from it" (cf. Dt. 4:2; Jer. 7:24,31; 19:5; I Kgs. 12:32-33; Num. 15:39-40). In 2 Samuel 6:3-7 we read of God’s judgement on David’s men who were moving the ark. Why were they judged? God was angry because they did not follow "the due order…as Moses commanded according to the word of the Lord" (1 Chr. 15:13-15). Jesus chided the Pharisees for adding to God’s law: "Why do you also transgress the commandment of God because of your tradition?" (Mt. 15:3). Jesus told the women at the well that "they that worship Him [God] must worship Him in spirit and in truth" (Jn. 4:24). When Jesus Christ gave orders to the apostles before His ascension into heaven, did He give the church the authority to make up their own doctrine, government, worship, and holy days? Absolutely not! He said to teach "them [the nations] to observe all things that I have commanded you" (Mt. 28:20). Jesus told the Pharisees who made up their own rules regarding worship, "In vain they do worship Me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men" (Mt. 15:9). Paul says that adding the commandments and doctrines of men to Christianity is "self imposed religion, false humility" and is of "no value against the indulgence of the flesh" (Col. 2:20-23).

The biblical teaching regarding worship is crystal clear. The church’s job is not to innovate and create new worship forms or ordinances, but simply to see what God has declared in His word and obey it. "The power of the church is purely ministerial and declarative. She is only to hold forth the doctrine, enforce the laws, and execute the government which Christ has given to her. She is to add nothing of her own to, and to subtract nothing from what her Lord has established. Discretionary power she does not possess."4 John W. Keddie writes, "The great Church historian William Cunningham pointed out that the implication of this [principle] 'if it were fully carried out, would just be to leave the Church in the condition in which it was left by the Apostles, in so far as we have any means of information—a result, surely, which need not be very alarming, except to those who think that they themselves have very superior powers for improving and adorning the Church by their inventions [The Reformers and the Theology of the Reformation, p. 32].' It scarcely needs to be pointed out that the consequences of the adoption of the laxer view—a basically permissive one, and unquestionably the predominant one today even in evangelical churches—has been the tendency for biblical materials in worship to be displaced and countless innovations of one sort or another, having no warrant in God’s word, to be introduced."5

The regulative principle of worship is crucial in understanding exclusive Psalmody, for while there is abundant biblical evidence that Psalms were used for praise in both the Old and New Testament eras, there is no evidence in the Bible that God’s people ever used uninspired human compositions in public worship. Churches which use uninspired hymns in public worship must prove that such a practice has biblical warrant from either a command, historical example or by deduction. In a moment we will examine the standard arguments used by Reformed authors to justify the use of uninspired songs in public worship. It will be shown that these arguments are based on either a faulty exegesis of Scripture, a misunderstanding or perversion of the regulative principle (e.g. praise as a circumstance of worship), or on unsubstantiated speculation (e.g., the hymn fragment argument). We will see that the Calvinistic Reformers, Scottish Presbyterians, French Huguenots, Dutch Reformed and English and American Puritans were biblically correct in maintaining exclusive Psalmody.