Talk:CharasVerse - Revision history

Admin at 22:38, 7 March 2007

Admin — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:38:58 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 7 March 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Yeah, these numbers only add confusion and clutter. A Charasverse: Namespace is all we need. I've already removed the number category from my user page and am going to do the rest to my pages because I think the idea is kinda ridiculous. Charasverse is an amazing idea, and good job on that, Warxe, but don't overcomplicate it. [[User:Osmose\|Osmose]] 11:32, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Yeah, these numbers only add confusion and clutter. A Charasverse: Namespace is all we need. I've already removed the number category from my user page and am going to do the rest to my pages because I think the idea is kinda ridiculous. Charasverse is an amazing idea, and good job on that, Warxe, but don't overcomplicate it. [[User:Osmose\|Osmose]] 11:32, 7 March 2007 (EST)

-	Fair enough. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:31, 7 March 2007 (EST)	+	Fair enough. I'm keeping the categories, though.
		+	And for the record, the number is your Charas Member ID (as is explained in this article). But if names work better, so be it. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:38, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Admin at 22:31, 7 March 2007

Admin — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 22:31:22 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 7 March 2007
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Yeah, these numbers only add confusion and clutter. A Charasverse: Namespace is all we need. I've already removed the number category from my user page and am going to do the rest to my pages because I think the idea is kinda ridiculous. Charasverse is an amazing idea, and good job on that, Warxe, but don't overcomplicate it. [[User:Osmose\|Osmose]] 11:32, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Yeah, these numbers only add confusion and clutter. A Charasverse: Namespace is all we need. I've already removed the number category from my user page and am going to do the rest to my pages because I think the idea is kinda ridiculous. Charasverse is an amazing idea, and good job on that, Warxe, but don't overcomplicate it. [[User:Osmose\|Osmose]] 11:32, 7 March 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	Fair enough. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 17:31, 7 March 2007 (EST)

Osmose at 16:32, 7 March 2007

Osmose — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:32:40 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:32, 7 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Is there any particular reason we're using random reality numbers rather than, say, "Micras Mythos" or "Iseo Reality" or something considerably easier to navigate? - [[User:SaiKar\|SaiKar]] 11:28, 7 March 2007 (EST)		Is there any particular reason we're using random reality numbers rather than, say, "Micras Mythos" or "Iseo Reality" or something considerably easier to navigate? - [[User:SaiKar\|SaiKar]] 11:28, 7 March 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	Yeah, these numbers only add confusion and clutter. A Charasverse: Namespace is all we need. I've already removed the number category from my user page and am going to do the rest to my pages because I think the idea is kinda ridiculous. Charasverse is an amazing idea, and good job on that, Warxe, but don't overcomplicate it. [[User:Osmose\|Osmose]] 11:32, 7 March 2007 (EST)

SaiKar at 16:28, 7 March 2007

SaiKar — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 16:28:05 GMT

New page

Is there any particular reason we're using random reality numbers rather than, say, "Micras Mythos" or "Iseo Reality" or something considerably easier to navigate? - [[User:SaiKar|SaiKar]] 11:28, 7 March 2007 (EST)