Marshall's "Gene Therapy on Trial" 2000
From Biol557
- Dusty Miller wants to find gene therapy for CF after death of Penn volunteer
- says we lack a good vector
- There is a general fear that nobody will do gene therapy reseach for a while because of the "crackdown" and recent negative media coverage
- FDA cracking down hard on gene therapy trials
- shut down all trials at Penn after death
- warning letter to St. Elizabeth Medical Center in Boston
- Two lessons learned by Penn accident:
- every vector has it’s limits
- the nature of human clinical trials is dangerous
Design By Committee
- Penn’s Insitute for Bioethics defends trial by saying "they had the best intentions"
- Jesse Gelsinger had an enzyme deficiency
- occurs when the X chromosome is missing or defective, producing to little of the liver enzyme OTC (ornithine transcarbamylase)
- OTC is needed to remove ammonia from the blood
- Most people die in infancy but if kept to a strict diet, can live a normal life.
- Purpose of the study was to use the adenovirus vector to inject OTC into Jesse’s liver.
- Adenovirus Vector Pros:
- it was the only one that worked “rapidly enough”
- most vectors take 3-6 weeks, adenovirus starts to work in 24 hours.
- Adenovirus Vector Cons:
- gene expression with this vector has a limited duration
- could possibly lead to need for liver transplat
- Initial patients would have almost no chance of benefitting:
- vector can only be given once
- patients develop an immune response to the vector
A meeting of experts decided to use adults rather than children
- "it’s wrong to do non-therapeutic research on someone who can’t consent."
- Toxicity trial in primates gave a level of toxicity they thought was comparable to humans
- Their plan was to start with a dose that was 5% of what caused maximum toxicity in primates
- 5 three-fold increases after the initial 5% does
- FDA agreed and gave them the "green light" in 1997
- 17 patients were injected this way, all experienced minor symptoms but nothing severe.
- Gelsinger was the 18th patient.
Surprising Toxicity
- Trying to figure out why Gelsinger’s toxicity was so much more severe than other patients
- his RBC precursors had been wiped out in his bone marrow
- concluded it was due to a pre-existing parvovirus
- also had high IL-6 which contributes to inflammation
- 1993 California gene therapy study showed a similar immune response when adenovirus was injected into CF patients.
- 1995 study in North Carolina also showed inflammation in CF patients using adenovirus because the vector stimulated nerve fibers in the epithelium causing an inflammatory response.
- said it was a capsid protein problem
- caused by the outer shell of the vector
- reached the target cells very late in the process
- Coxsackie adenovirus receptor (CAR): is much more prevalent in mouse livers
- CAR is needed for uptake of vector.
A Mortal Blow for Adenovirus:
- want to try and engineer the vector to not be so dangerous.
- high doses will always be necessary