Timesplitterswiki - User contributions [en]

Assault

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:24:26 GMT

DSRPS3:

Assault was an [[Arcade|Arcade Custom]] mode which was first seen in [[TimeSplitters 2]] and then returned in [[TimeSplitters: Future Perfect]].

=Aim=

The aim of this mode depends on which team you are playing on. If on the red team, your aim is to complete set objectives within a certain time limit. If on the blue team, your aim is to stop the red team from completing their objectives and to hold them back until the time has elapsed. This mode was only featured on a few maps on each of the two games and in [[TimeSplitters 2]] human players could only play on the red team and could therefore not defend.

=TimeSplitters 2 Assault Maps=

In [[TimeSplitters 2]] there were 3 maps with Assault modes and the player could only play on the red team to attack.

==[[Training Ground]]==

This Assault sees you going from one base to destroy the interior of the other.

===Objective 1 - Seize The Middle Ground===

For the first objective you will start off in the base the blue team occupy in a [[Capture The Bag]] game. You simply have to get past the waterfall at the middle of the map to complete the objective. The major obstacles in the way are 3 automatic gun turrets which can hit you from a distance.

===Objective 2 - Destroy The Fuel Supplies===

For this objective, you will respawn by the waterfall and have to move up the slope to the enemy base. Around the base are 6 fuel barrels which must be destroyed. In this area are another 2 automatic gun turrets which will target anyone who attempts to move towards the base.

===Objective 3 - Destroy The Computers===

You will respawn closer to the base for this objective and must get inside to destroy the many computers along the walls. There are no more gun turrets and so the only obstacles are the respawning enemies next to the computers. Once every computer has been destroyed, the game is over and the red team has won.

===Strategy===

*If possible, let team-mates draw the fire from the gun turrets by letting them go first.
*The first turret can be easily dispached by going to the left. Go up close and you will be out of it's line of sight with a clear shot of the lens to disable it quickly.
*The two automatic gun turrets on the way to the waterfall can be disabled by using the manual turret in the bunker looking onto them. Firing this turrets secondary fire will deal with the turrets with ease.
*When first moving into the enemy base, take the [[Sniper Rifle]] on the ledge you go past. This will let you destroy the gun turret lenses without being in danger of them firing back.
*When attacking the computers, firing grenades with the [[Soviet S47]] will destroy them with ease.

==[[Scrapyard]]==

This Assault involves invading an underground base and making your way to the control room.

===Objective 1 - Breach The Airlock===

For this objective, you simply have to get inside the first tunnel of the structure. There are however 8 automatic gun turrets between the spawn points and the area you must reach to complete the objective. 5 of these are before you even reach the structure, but all have limited range. 4 of them fire lasergun shots and the top-centre one fires grenades. The airlock itself has another two lasergun turrets and just past it is another grenade turret on the ceiling. These turrets can prove vrey difficult to get past.

===Objective 2 - Secure Cooling Towers===

The second objective again involves reaching a certain point. You will respawn by the airlock and need to get past a spiralling room and then past two towers to complete the objective. Before you reach this point however, you will encounter another 7 gun turrets. The first one is hidden in a small alcove quite near to the spawn point and fires lasergun shots. In the spiralling room are another 3 lasergun turrets that will be able to hit you at any point lower than them in the room. Once past this room, you will be at the cooling towers where there are 3 turrets that fire rockets at you. Getting into the next corridor will complete the objective.

===Objective 3 - Seize Control Room===

The third objective requires you to get to the heart of the base. You will spawn in the cooling tower room and have to go around a passageway due to a door being closed. Along the way will be 2 rocket turrets, 3 plasma turrets and a lasergun turret. The two rocket turrets are very near to the spawn point and can kill you very quickly. The first plasma turret is hidden by a wall at first and will fire at anyone who tries to go down a vital passageway. After this passageway is a large room with a pillar and a plasma turret on each side of it. Moving up towards the control room, you will encounter the lasergun turret which can send you back to the spawn point very quickly. Getting past this turret will take you to the control room and complete this Assault mission.

===Strategy===

*The first turrets will stop anyone getting close to the structure. Getting a [[Plasma Autorifle]] and firing [[Plasma Grenade|Plasma Grenades]] from a distance will disable them however.
*Entering the airlock whilst the turrets are there will resolve in near instant death. However. hiding outside and firing a [[Plasma Grenade]] when someone opens the door will make it safe.
*Some turrets can be easily disabled by standing underneath them and firing at the red light.
* In the spiralling room, firing [[Plasma Grenade|Plasma Grenades]] at the small balconies will disable turrets underneath before they can fire at you.
* In the spiralling room, there is a [[Homing Launcher]]. Using it's secondary fire will disable any turret.
*If you have teammates, it is sometimes better to let them draw fire from turrets whilst you disable them.

==[[Hangar]]==

This match requires you to get to the hangar

===Objective 1 - Destroy all the autoguns===

There will be about 10-12 autoguns spanning the area from the start till the locked door at the end, some are on the floor, some are on the ceiling and some are attached to the wall, Best pick up that Soviet rifle

===Objective 2 - Open the Hangar Door===

As soon as you have cleared out all of the autoguns you will have to go up the stairs to reach the switch for the final objective, pretty straightforward but watch out for thew bots as they may have that rocket launcher.

===Objective 3 - Destroy the Barrels===

Much like the training ground objective, Destroy the 3 or 4 barrels next to the two sets of wheels, if you complete this, MISSION COMPLETE

=Timesplitters: Future Perfect Assault=

There is 4 maps to play assault on this time round, Mars Prison, VR, Vietnam and the return of Training Ground, this game introduces playing as the defending side aswell as attacking
{{Mode}}

Assault

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:20:47 GMT

DSRPS3:

Team Deathmatch

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:08:20 GMT

DSRPS3:

'''Team Deathmatch''' is similar to Deathmatch, except for in this mode players split up into up to four teams(Red, Yellow, Green and Blue) and fight. Whoever has the most kills by the end of the time limit wins.
NOTE: in TS1 this mode is available in deathmatch, one of the options is teamplay
{{Mode}}

Village Glitch

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:03:58 GMT

DSRPS3:

{{Infobox Glitch|
name = Village Glitch|
credit = DSRPS3|
}}

In the stairs heading down to a single room, you will see to your left a small ledge, go onto it and run straight off it to the wall above the stairs, it will be black.

Glitches

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 14:00:54 GMT

DSRPS3:

{{Warning|Although not always frowned-upon, we do not encourage the use of glitches online. If you choose to use the glitches here or any of the links in this section, you do so at your own expense!}}

This page has the list of glitches for all the TimeSplitters games. You can even list your own glitches that you have found here too.

==TimeSplitters Glitches==
*[[Challenge Glitches]]
*[[Spaceways Glitch]]
*[[Village Glitch]]

==TimeSplitters 2 Glitches==
*[[Chasm Glitches]]
*[[Compound Stairs Glitch]]
*[[Flame Tag Glitch]]
*[[Monkey Immolation Glitch]]
*[[Playing with Fire Glitch]]
*[[Trooper Grey Team]]
*[[Ufopia Stuck Glitch]]
*[[Ufopia wall]]
*[[Waterfall Glitch]]

==TimeSplitters Future Perfect Glitches==
*[[Mansion of Madness Boss Glitch]]
*[[Mapmaker Glitches]]
*[[Mapmaker Ramp Glitches]]
*[[Map Memory Glitch]]
*[[Play as Monkey in Monkey Assistant]]
*[[Scotland the Brave Truck Glitch]]
*[[Scotland the Brave Secret Boss Glitch]]
*[[Scotland the Brave Submarine Gunner Glitch]]
*[[Siberia Buggy Glitches]]
*[[Siberia Tower Glitches]]
*[[Waterfall Glitch]]
*[[You Genius U-Genix Security Camera Glitch]]

TS Chat

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:59:55 GMT

DSRPS3: /* Chat */

== Community Tips & Ideas ==
*[[Weapon Tips]]
*[[Cheats]]
*[[Glitches]]

<center>'''[[How to use Chat]]'''</center>

== Chat ==
{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:DSRPS3|DSRPS3]] 15:00, 6 October 2007 (Uk Time)|
post = Thinking about adding to glitches page, i know a good one in the village
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 08:47, 6 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Ahhh, logo? gone?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 16:21, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = I did upload a few more pages recently. I'm just never on TSFP.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 16:11, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = The Mapmaker Wiki seems kind of dead. It was a good idea in principle, since the Mapmaker is such a complex program. I'd love to help out, but I don't want to be the only one.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 12:45, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Fixed the TS1 image. Also ILHI, are we gonna use the Mapmaker Wiki?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 11:58, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Add them to the Trivia pages.

Also we need a new image on the front page for TS1.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:stickmeninc|stickmeninc]] 5 October 2007|
post = Have you guys ever thought of creating a TimeSplitters: Future Perfect game Mistakes page, because I can think of one massive mistake in the game and it isn't a glitch.

The mistake is this: On the first level the bridge gets destroyed and then the TimeSplitter Mothership is destroyed, but when you go back there in the second from last level to protect your past self from the Time assains the TimeSplitter Mothership gets destroyed first and then the bridge.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Vermilion Maiden|Vermilion Maiden]] 5 October 2007|
post = You probably noticed this already, but the picture of the [[TimeSplitters]] game case thing isn't showing up on the main page anymore
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Fauch|Fauch]] 17:40, 1 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = I also thought it is small, but the other guy says medium, so when I saw this I wasn't sure if it was a pretty big small level or a pretty small medium level...
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 11:53, 28 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Mall isn't that big is it, from memory, it was rather small with a little street on the side and an area on the second floor. Small if you ask me.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Fauch|Fauch]] 21:10, 27 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = At the beginning of the level, if you look up, you can see a little bit of blue.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 14:45, 27 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = I didn't even know you could see the sky on Cyberden.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Fauch|Fauch]] 14:27, 27 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = I'm editing the maps section, it misses informations a bit and you are wrong about some things.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 15:59, 25 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Fine, we'll disregard weapons then. As for the allies thing, I think we've got a good system already. Just changing it to bots would be confusing because you wouldn't be able to differentiate between allies and enemies.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 10:07, 25 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Noticed the weapons thing, although we'd have to spend time checking where each 5/6 weapons spawn and match them up with the places the weapons spawn on the map. Not much a point anyway, the strategy is what people follow and that should mention all weapons needed anyway.

An allies section would help for Arcade League, that's the only think I would consider changing. Or we could just chane "enemies" to "bots" on the template.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 16:56, 24 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Heavythehobbit: Please don't spam in TS Chat.

I was looking through the Arcade League pages and I realized I didn't add a category for [[weapons]] in the Infobox for either Arcade League or Challenge. Anyway, I could go back and edit the Infoboxes to include this category, but that would mean we'd have to go back and edit all existing Infoboxes to include the new category. I could also add a spot for Allies and anything else I forgot if I were to do that. Anyway, what do you all think?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Heavythehobbit|Heavythehobbit]] 15:38, 24 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Honk!
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 12:39, 19 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Oh yes, they do lack correct info. I think someone went around the pages and input a number from 1 - 5. In TS2 Cortez is a 5 star. So someone went and put 5 star on the other Cortez attires. He's 4 star in Future Perfect though. And I've had to change nearly every AI on Future Perfect so far if it was entered already.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 16:01, 18 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = I don't know, perhaps we could focus our efforts on something? Like completing the [[Weapons]] section? There's only a few [[TS1]] weapons that still need pages. Or we could focus on improving the character pages, since many of those lack info (or correct info).
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 09:52, 18 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well, actually, I edit quite a bit. Although it's usually adding the "Improvement Badge" and "Need Info" banners. I'm lazy.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 02:47, 18 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Any reason other than simple laziness? I can't think of any others.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 17:20, 17 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = We seem to have come to a bit of a stand-still, both in terms of our chatting and our editing. :(
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:30, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Oh, so Reviews are a bad idea? Well, I just thought it would be a good idea, if you guys think they aren't important to the Wiki, no harm done. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 15:35, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Reviews are entirely opinion, and they really have no place on a Wiki. I'm not saying your review's bad at all, but it'd be more suited to your personal web site than to the Wiki. It'd be akin to adding a review of a famous book in Encyclopedia Brittanica - it doesn't really add anything, because personal opinions are all debatable. I realize this Wiki doesn't adhere too much to Wikipedia's NPOV (Neutral Point of View) policy, and that's fine (personally, it's actually better the way it is lol), but reviews are just too much opinion and not enough unbiased fact to merit having here. Sorry.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 11:13, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I'm going to be rather harsh and say I don't think it's a good idea. The reason behind this new responce is because I just sat and thought what a review is: an opinion of how good a game is. And the problem is the keyword: opinion. It's okay to state what the community thinks of something (ie. "Many fans prefer TS2's challenge mode over TSFP's") but not the writer's personal opinion, because a personal opinion is not as factual as the statistic "Many fans prefer".

Please do not take this critism the wrong way. It's just that if you take away the opinion parts of the review, you're left with an article that basically is the same as [[TimeSplitters_(Game)|this page]], and then what's the point in having reviews in the first place?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 07:35, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I like the fact that you reviewed the different aspects.

However
*Goldeneye, never played it, and it is not a TimeSplitters game.
*Never compare a game to its sequels. Why? Most reviews are reviewed soon after the game. When TS4 is released and you write one, you wont say "it didn't match up to the standard of TS5", it doesn't exist.
*The Story was great, didn't match up to TS2 or FP however, but than I couldn't say that.
*Music and Sound, full marks for me. TimeSplitters games have the best soundtracks, only a few Final Fantasy games come close, and most of the time it's only a few tracks. Orchestrated music doesn't belong in TimeSplitters, a Frantic FPS.
*Mentioning of TS2 in Overall
*You say the mapmaker is phenominal and simple-- but not great?
*Never compare to sequels.

Apart from that, it's good.

}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 02:50, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = TimeSplitters is a completely different series to Goldeneye. Despite coming after it, TimeSplitters is only related to it in that the 4 founding members of FRD worked on Goldeneye.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 16:51, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I was kinda hoping the rest of you would help clean that one up and start the other ones. If you think you can make the review better, try editting it yourself, I'm sure you're far better at formal writing than I am... :(

But I have to agree with you, sorry for mentioning Goldeneye so many times, but wasn't [[TimeSplitters]] suppose to be another follow-up to Goldeneye? I tried to have some balance between Goldeneye, TimeSplitters itself and it's sequels.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 16:36, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = To be honest the first few lines are a bit chatty, and throughout the review you keep mentioning Goldeneye (I've really got to play that game for more than 10 minutes). Please do remember that since this is a wiki, your review may be changed here and there. Apart from that, they're alright.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 15:37, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Please tell me what you think of my [[TimeSplitters Review]], did I do a good job? Is it formal enough? I also did a [[Reviews]] page where you can access the reviews easier. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 02:42, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I would give it a go, but expect it to be changed here and there. Wiki's are more of fact than opinion, and if I were to review TS2 for example I'd compare it to the other TS games rather than other FPS's. But give it a shot!
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 19:07, 26 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Also, guys, if it's not too much trouble, do you guys think adding professional unbiased reviews of the three TS games would be good? I have this Xbox Magazine's Guide to Halo 2 (don't ask me why I have it and PLEASE don't call traitor). Along with everything Halo 2, it had a review of Halo 2 in it and they constantly praised it, ick. Anyway, do you guys think reviews should be part of the Wiki?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:32, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Drifting, I assume Struan's MapMaker is for Windows only? I have a Mac, so I can't use Windows programs. And my Mac is too old to use Virtual PC very well.

But I have to agree with you on one thing, a dedicated MapMaker Wiki would be a good idea, since the MapMaker in TS is very robust and versatile. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 10:11, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Koopa: So you're saying that [http://mapmaker.struan.net/ Struan's Mapmaker] isn't good enough for your means? As far as the online MapMaking community goes, Struan's program is still pretty much the accepted standard for showing maps to other people online. It's probably the easiest way to share maps, since the program can convert maps into web-ready HTML ([http://www.geocities.com/timesplittersmaps/Outpost13_admiralhowdy.html Example here]).

However, I'm not sure how well the Wiki would be able to display an HTML map. One option is to create your map in Struan's MapMaker, take a screenshot of it and post the pic up onto the Wiki along with map info. At the moment, this is really the only way I can think of, short of sending maps into the TimeSplitters Map Connection or starting your own Mapmaker site independent of the Wiki.

ILHI: MapMaker Wiki is a good idea. The TS Wiki doesn't go very in depth into Mapmaker (at least not yet), so a Wiki dedicated specifically to it is a great idea.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 07:54, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I've lead a lot of links to this site. All I need to do now is add maps, and maybe some navigation stuff. I'm also gonna get pictures and possibly use that program where you can create your maps online. [http://editthis.info/tsmapmakerwiki/Main_Page link]
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 05:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = ''Koopa:'' Still, you could use those programs then post the output upon a page upon that link.

''ILHI:'' Tell me if you get it up and running and we'll interlink. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 21:27, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Drifting, that's not what I meant, what I meant was a mapmaking tool of some sort, either offline or online. Kinda like those mapmaking tools that were popular for a time, but became obsolete. Words are not enough to express or to emulate a map, we need a VISUAL aid to show people our maps.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 15:59, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = That's not right! I edited loads of pages today, editing one or two figures. Does it have to have a link on the page in stead or something?

On the mapmaker thing. Well, because I wanted to add my maps, but didn't want to spam here, I was gonna create a TimeSplitters Map Maker Wiki. I forgot to do that, I'm gonna do it anyway. Just because I like making maps.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = Drifting 14:34, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well, I checked on the Editthis main page about the new anti-spam verification system. Supposedly, it will ask for verification now only when someone is adding a new link (which is why I've kept my username unlinked for this post to test it). I've suggested to the admin that it only ask for verification when a user is posting an external link. We'll see how that works out.

EDIT: It still comes up. How annoying.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 14:22, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = About anti-spam - hmm, that's odd. We might want to inquire about it.

Koopa64: We already have a place on TS Wiki to share custom maps - the [[Mapmaker Ideas]] page. ;)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 13:59, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well, spam problems aside, I think we should do something about custom [[Mapmaker]] levels, I have tons of TS:FP levels and TS2 levels that I want to share with you guys, but we have no means of doing so. Sure there have been several times where this idea flopped, but this is the TSWiki, it needs some user-made maps too. I personally think this is a serious issue we haven't dealt with yet.

Can you admins do something about this?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 16:14, 23 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I haven't noticed it yet. Maybe editthis decided to add such a feature.

EDIT: Noticed it. Perhaps they heard our call ^_^
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 14:37, 23 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I'm noticing that in order to edit a lot of pages, you have to enter a code now. Is this the new anti-spam device?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 19:35, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = ... It doesn't seem to follow the Sticky code, but ok, I'll try it.

... >_> It isn't working... All I get is "Template:Sticky - Example". :(
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 16:28, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = That's just an example, it isn't but, if you want to add another sticky, then add this on the end.

<pre>
|{{ (Insert sticky name) }}
|-

</pre>}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 14:03, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Umm... What's that sticky's purpose? I thought the Custom sticky was for making personalized stickies.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 04:49, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = It's gonna change, I'm on it right now. Also, my old TS1 and TS2 saves were wiped, along with my brothers, as was my TSFP, but I has made a copy to my memory card. So this meaning the totals are not my totals. As I didn't go on TS1 a lot in the olden days however, I can give my TS1, and TSFP.

Also, If you want to add more stickies, add this after the last sticky:

<pre>|-
|{{Sticky - something}}
</pre>}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:52, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Hey Xylaquin, thanks for the All sticky, now I can add some more without messing up my page. :D

Another thing, I think posting you're total playtime in the TS games is something we should start doing. I would like to know how long you admins have played the TS games. :) Go to my page to see what I mean.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 17:48, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = ILHI saves the day again ^_^
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 16:31, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Unbanned him. Go to the Special Page about Blocked IPs and Accounts, click unban next to the member.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 16:02, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = You're right Nevar, when I saw it I suspected it, but on further inspection I noticed the 4th character is uncapitalized and the name does kinda make sence. Problem is, I'm not sure how to unban a member :(

I'll change their userpage.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Nevar00|Nevar00]] 14:23, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Are you sure Selwyn was a spambot? His name was quite different from the others... and I noticed in the recent changes he was "suspected" of being one.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 13:47, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = [http://www.editthis.info/timesplitterswiki/Category:Wiki_-_Spambot link] to other features they have.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 12:42, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Wow, I had no idea we had this many spambots. I'd assumed we'd only had a few based on how many was actually attacked. Maybe we should change our registration process.

EDIT: Notice that all of the spambots have 6 character names?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 08:05, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = http://www.toptrumps.com/forum/smileys/smiley3.gif That's a lot.

Also, should we delete the "All Outdoors" category, for now anyway? Because there is one map, and it isn't all outdoors.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 06:57, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = New Category: Wiki - Spambot

On visiting the Userlist, I noticed that there were around 50 other spambot accounts lying in wait untill they strike yet another talk page with links. On a more positive note, there also a new sticky I made. Since some of us have All the TimeSplitters game, I've created a "All" sticky which states this. It saves people using 3 stickies.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:46, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Also, I added another sticky to my page.

Are YOU a supporter of Classic Gaming?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:25, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Sorry I can't be of any help to you guys on this matter, I'm not really Admin material... :(

In other news, I found somebody who (evidently) discovered the "[[Play as Monkey in Monkey Assistant]]" glitch. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 18:01, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Bots aren't clever enough to go and email an email address with their email. Are they?

I come on here loads. Just because it's in my chain of websites I visit, so, yeah, we can do it fairly quickly, but it's really annoying.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 17:57, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Hmm, maybe. But how are we going to be able to tell who's a bot and who's not based solely on an e-mail address. Granted, this system would allow us to block the most obvious offenders, but we might block out some legit users in the process. It's a bit of a conundrum, really. I really don't think we have enough of a problem with spambots yet to warrant this system. At the moment, we seem to be able to reverse their vandalism fairly quickly.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 17:24, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] and I have just banned two spambots. These things are trouble as there's no option to enable bot-stoppers in registration (like "type these characters"). Registration is disabled at the moment. Perhaps we should implement a system where new registrants email an email address and are then registered by an Admin; this wouldn't be a lot of work since not many people join frequently.

But having to email to join does deter new members...
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 14:47, 17 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Biggest archive to date XD
}}

==Chat Archives==
Ever so often when the page gets big, it is cut and pasted into these archives and the chat page is clean for more chat!
*[[Chat:18/8/6-14/10/6]]
*[[Chat:14/10/6-1/12/6]]
*[[Chat:1/12/6-27/12/6]]
*[[Chat:20/1/7-24/4/7]]
*[[Chat:28/4/7-17/6/7]]
*[[Chat:19/6/7-16/8/7]]

TS Chat

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:57:54 GMT

DSRPS3: /* Chat */

== Community Tips & Ideas ==
*[[Weapon Tips]]
*[[Cheats]]
*[[Glitches]]

<center>'''[[How to use Chat]]'''</center>

== Chat ==
{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:DSRPS3|DSRPS3]] 15:00, 6 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Thinking about adding to glitches page, i know a good one in the village
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 08:47, 6 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Ahhh, logo? gone?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 16:21, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = I did upload a few more pages recently. I'm just never on TSFP.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 16:11, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = The Mapmaker Wiki seems kind of dead. It was a good idea in principle, since the Mapmaker is such a complex program. I'd love to help out, but I don't want to be the only one.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 12:45, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Fixed the TS1 image. Also ILHI, are we gonna use the Mapmaker Wiki?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 11:58, 5 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = Add them to the Trivia pages.

Also we need a new image on the front page for TS1.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:stickmeninc|stickmeninc]] 5 October 2007|
post = Have you guys ever thought of creating a TimeSplitters: Future Perfect game Mistakes page, because I can think of one massive mistake in the game and it isn't a glitch.

The mistake is this: On the first level the bridge gets destroyed and then the TimeSplitter Mothership is destroyed, but when you go back there in the second from last level to protect your past self from the Time assains the TimeSplitter Mothership gets destroyed first and then the bridge.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Vermilion Maiden|Vermilion Maiden]] 5 October 2007|
post = You probably noticed this already, but the picture of the [[TimeSplitters]] game case thing isn't showing up on the main page anymore
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Fauch|Fauch]] 17:40, 1 October 2007 (EDT)|
post = I also thought it is small, but the other guy says medium, so when I saw this I wasn't sure if it was a pretty big small level or a pretty small medium level...
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 11:53, 28 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Mall isn't that big is it, from memory, it was rather small with a little street on the side and an area on the second floor. Small if you ask me.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Fauch|Fauch]] 21:10, 27 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = At the beginning of the level, if you look up, you can see a little bit of blue.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 14:45, 27 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = I didn't even know you could see the sky on Cyberden.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Fauch|Fauch]] 14:27, 27 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = I'm editing the maps section, it misses informations a bit and you are wrong about some things.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 15:59, 25 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Fine, we'll disregard weapons then. As for the allies thing, I think we've got a good system already. Just changing it to bots would be confusing because you wouldn't be able to differentiate between allies and enemies.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 10:07, 25 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Noticed the weapons thing, although we'd have to spend time checking where each 5/6 weapons spawn and match them up with the places the weapons spawn on the map. Not much a point anyway, the strategy is what people follow and that should mention all weapons needed anyway.

An allies section would help for Arcade League, that's the only think I would consider changing. Or we could just chane "enemies" to "bots" on the template.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 16:56, 24 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Heavythehobbit: Please don't spam in TS Chat.

I was looking through the Arcade League pages and I realized I didn't add a category for [[weapons]] in the Infobox for either Arcade League or Challenge. Anyway, I could go back and edit the Infoboxes to include this category, but that would mean we'd have to go back and edit all existing Infoboxes to include the new category. I could also add a spot for Allies and anything else I forgot if I were to do that. Anyway, what do you all think?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Heavythehobbit|Heavythehobbit]] 15:38, 24 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Honk!
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 12:39, 19 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Oh yes, they do lack correct info. I think someone went around the pages and input a number from 1 - 5. In TS2 Cortez is a 5 star. So someone went and put 5 star on the other Cortez attires. He's 4 star in Future Perfect though. And I've had to change nearly every AI on Future Perfect so far if it was entered already.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 16:01, 18 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = I don't know, perhaps we could focus our efforts on something? Like completing the [[Weapons]] section? There's only a few [[TS1]] weapons that still need pages. Or we could focus on improving the character pages, since many of those lack info (or correct info).
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 09:52, 18 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well, actually, I edit quite a bit. Although it's usually adding the "Improvement Badge" and "Need Info" banners. I'm lazy.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 02:47, 18 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = Any reason other than simple laziness? I can't think of any others.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 17:20, 17 September 2007 (EDT)|
post = We seem to have come to a bit of a stand-still, both in terms of our chatting and our editing. :(
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:30, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Oh, so Reviews are a bad idea? Well, I just thought it would be a good idea, if you guys think they aren't important to the Wiki, no harm done. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 15:35, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Reviews are entirely opinion, and they really have no place on a Wiki. I'm not saying your review's bad at all, but it'd be more suited to your personal web site than to the Wiki. It'd be akin to adding a review of a famous book in Encyclopedia Brittanica - it doesn't really add anything, because personal opinions are all debatable. I realize this Wiki doesn't adhere too much to Wikipedia's NPOV (Neutral Point of View) policy, and that's fine (personally, it's actually better the way it is lol), but reviews are just too much opinion and not enough unbiased fact to merit having here. Sorry.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 11:13, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I'm going to be rather harsh and say I don't think it's a good idea. The reason behind this new responce is because I just sat and thought what a review is: an opinion of how good a game is. And the problem is the keyword: opinion. It's okay to state what the community thinks of something (ie. "Many fans prefer TS2's challenge mode over TSFP's") but not the writer's personal opinion, because a personal opinion is not as factual as the statistic "Many fans prefer".

Please do not take this critism the wrong way. It's just that if you take away the opinion parts of the review, you're left with an article that basically is the same as [[TimeSplitters_(Game)|this page]], and then what's the point in having reviews in the first place?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 07:35, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I like the fact that you reviewed the different aspects.

However
*Goldeneye, never played it, and it is not a TimeSplitters game.
*Never compare a game to its sequels. Why? Most reviews are reviewed soon after the game. When TS4 is released and you write one, you wont say "it didn't match up to the standard of TS5", it doesn't exist.
*The Story was great, didn't match up to TS2 or FP however, but than I couldn't say that.
*Music and Sound, full marks for me. TimeSplitters games have the best soundtracks, only a few Final Fantasy games come close, and most of the time it's only a few tracks. Orchestrated music doesn't belong in TimeSplitters, a Frantic FPS.
*Mentioning of TS2 in Overall
*You say the mapmaker is phenominal and simple-- but not great?
*Never compare to sequels.

Apart from that, it's good.

}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 02:50, 28 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = TimeSplitters is a completely different series to Goldeneye. Despite coming after it, TimeSplitters is only related to it in that the 4 founding members of FRD worked on Goldeneye.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 16:51, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I was kinda hoping the rest of you would help clean that one up and start the other ones. If you think you can make the review better, try editting it yourself, I'm sure you're far better at formal writing than I am... :(

But I have to agree with you, sorry for mentioning Goldeneye so many times, but wasn't [[TimeSplitters]] suppose to be another follow-up to Goldeneye? I tried to have some balance between Goldeneye, TimeSplitters itself and it's sequels.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 16:36, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = To be honest the first few lines are a bit chatty, and throughout the review you keep mentioning Goldeneye (I've really got to play that game for more than 10 minutes). Please do remember that since this is a wiki, your review may be changed here and there. Apart from that, they're alright.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 15:37, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Please tell me what you think of my [[TimeSplitters Review]], did I do a good job? Is it formal enough? I also did a [[Reviews]] page where you can access the reviews easier. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 02:42, 27 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I would give it a go, but expect it to be changed here and there. Wiki's are more of fact than opinion, and if I were to review TS2 for example I'd compare it to the other TS games rather than other FPS's. But give it a shot!
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 19:07, 26 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Also, guys, if it's not too much trouble, do you guys think adding professional unbiased reviews of the three TS games would be good? I have this Xbox Magazine's Guide to Halo 2 (don't ask me why I have it and PLEASE don't call traitor). Along with everything Halo 2, it had a review of Halo 2 in it and they constantly praised it, ick. Anyway, do you guys think reviews should be part of the Wiki?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:32, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Drifting, I assume Struan's MapMaker is for Windows only? I have a Mac, so I can't use Windows programs. And my Mac is too old to use Virtual PC very well.

But I have to agree with you on one thing, a dedicated MapMaker Wiki would be a good idea, since the MapMaker in TS is very robust and versatile. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 10:11, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Koopa: So you're saying that [http://mapmaker.struan.net/ Struan's Mapmaker] isn't good enough for your means? As far as the online MapMaking community goes, Struan's program is still pretty much the accepted standard for showing maps to other people online. It's probably the easiest way to share maps, since the program can convert maps into web-ready HTML ([http://www.geocities.com/timesplittersmaps/Outpost13_admiralhowdy.html Example here]).

However, I'm not sure how well the Wiki would be able to display an HTML map. One option is to create your map in Struan's MapMaker, take a screenshot of it and post the pic up onto the Wiki along with map info. At the moment, this is really the only way I can think of, short of sending maps into the TimeSplitters Map Connection or starting your own Mapmaker site independent of the Wiki.

ILHI: MapMaker Wiki is a good idea. The TS Wiki doesn't go very in depth into Mapmaker (at least not yet), so a Wiki dedicated specifically to it is a great idea.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 07:54, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I've lead a lot of links to this site. All I need to do now is add maps, and maybe some navigation stuff. I'm also gonna get pictures and possibly use that program where you can create your maps online. [http://editthis.info/tsmapmakerwiki/Main_Page link]
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 05:36, 25 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = ''Koopa:'' Still, you could use those programs then post the output upon a page upon that link.

''ILHI:'' Tell me if you get it up and running and we'll interlink. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 21:27, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Drifting, that's not what I meant, what I meant was a mapmaking tool of some sort, either offline or online. Kinda like those mapmaking tools that were popular for a time, but became obsolete. Words are not enough to express or to emulate a map, we need a VISUAL aid to show people our maps.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 15:59, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = That's not right! I edited loads of pages today, editing one or two figures. Does it have to have a link on the page in stead or something?

On the mapmaker thing. Well, because I wanted to add my maps, but didn't want to spam here, I was gonna create a TimeSplitters Map Maker Wiki. I forgot to do that, I'm gonna do it anyway. Just because I like making maps.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = Drifting 14:34, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well, I checked on the Editthis main page about the new anti-spam verification system. Supposedly, it will ask for verification now only when someone is adding a new link (which is why I've kept my username unlinked for this post to test it). I've suggested to the admin that it only ask for verification when a user is posting an external link. We'll see how that works out.

EDIT: It still comes up. How annoying.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 14:22, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = About anti-spam - hmm, that's odd. We might want to inquire about it.

Koopa64: We already have a place on TS Wiki to share custom maps - the [[Mapmaker Ideas]] page. ;)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 13:59, 24 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well, spam problems aside, I think we should do something about custom [[Mapmaker]] levels, I have tons of TS:FP levels and TS2 levels that I want to share with you guys, but we have no means of doing so. Sure there have been several times where this idea flopped, but this is the TSWiki, it needs some user-made maps too. I personally think this is a serious issue we haven't dealt with yet.

Can you admins do something about this?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 16:14, 23 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I haven't noticed it yet. Maybe editthis decided to add such a feature.

EDIT: Noticed it. Perhaps they heard our call ^_^
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 14:37, 23 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = I'm noticing that in order to edit a lot of pages, you have to enter a code now. Is this the new anti-spam device?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 19:35, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = ... It doesn't seem to follow the Sticky code, but ok, I'll try it.

... >_> It isn't working... All I get is "Template:Sticky - Example". :(
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 16:28, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = That's just an example, it isn't but, if you want to add another sticky, then add this on the end.

<pre>
|{{ (Insert sticky name) }}
|-

</pre>}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 14:03, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Umm... What's that sticky's purpose? I thought the Custom sticky was for making personalized stickies.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 04:49, 20 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = It's gonna change, I'm on it right now. Also, my old TS1 and TS2 saves were wiped, along with my brothers, as was my TSFP, but I has made a copy to my memory card. So this meaning the totals are not my totals. As I didn't go on TS1 a lot in the olden days however, I can give my TS1, and TSFP.

Also, If you want to add more stickies, add this after the last sticky:

<pre>|-
|{{Sticky - something}}
</pre>}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:52, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Hey Xylaquin, thanks for the All sticky, now I can add some more without messing up my page. :D

Another thing, I think posting you're total playtime in the TS games is something we should start doing. I would like to know how long you admins have played the TS games. :) Go to my page to see what I mean.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 17:48, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = ILHI saves the day again ^_^
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 16:31, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Unbanned him. Go to the Special Page about Blocked IPs and Accounts, click unban next to the member.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 16:02, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = You're right Nevar, when I saw it I suspected it, but on further inspection I noticed the 4th character is uncapitalized and the name does kinda make sence. Problem is, I'm not sure how to unban a member :(

I'll change their userpage.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Nevar00|Nevar00]] 14:23, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Are you sure Selwyn was a spambot? His name was quite different from the others... and I noticed in the recent changes he was "suspected" of being one.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 13:47, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = [http://www.editthis.info/timesplitterswiki/Category:Wiki_-_Spambot link] to other features they have.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 12:42, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Wow, I had no idea we had this many spambots. I'd assumed we'd only had a few based on how many was actually attacked. Maybe we should change our registration process.

EDIT: Notice that all of the spambots have 6 character names?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 08:05, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = http://www.toptrumps.com/forum/smileys/smiley3.gif That's a lot.

Also, should we delete the "All Outdoors" category, for now anyway? Because there is one map, and it isn't all outdoors.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 06:57, 19 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = New Category: Wiki - Spambot

On visiting the Userlist, I noticed that there were around 50 other spambot accounts lying in wait untill they strike yet another talk page with links. On a more positive note, there also a new sticky I made. Since some of us have All the TimeSplitters game, I've created a "All" sticky which states this. It saves people using 3 stickies.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:46, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Also, I added another sticky to my page.

Are YOU a supporter of Classic Gaming?
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Koopa64|Koopa64]] 18:25, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Sorry I can't be of any help to you guys on this matter, I'm not really Admin material... :(

In other news, I found somebody who (evidently) discovered the "[[Play as Monkey in Monkey Assistant]]" glitch. :)
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] 18:01, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Bots aren't clever enough to go and email an email address with their email. Are they?

I come on here loads. Just because it's in my chain of websites I visit, so, yeah, we can do it fairly quickly, but it's really annoying.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Drifting|Drifting]] 17:57, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Hmm, maybe. But how are we going to be able to tell who's a bot and who's not based solely on an e-mail address. Granted, this system would allow us to block the most obvious offenders, but we might block out some legit users in the process. It's a bit of a conundrum, really. I really don't think we have enough of a problem with spambots yet to warrant this system. At the moment, we seem to be able to reverse their vandalism fairly quickly.
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 17:24, 18 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Well [[User:ILHI|ILHI]] and I have just banned two spambots. These things are trouble as there's no option to enable bot-stoppers in registration (like "type these characters"). Registration is disabled at the moment. Perhaps we should implement a system where new registrants email an email address and are then registered by an Admin; this wouldn't be a lot of work since not many people join frequently.

But having to email to join does deter new members...
}}

{{Infobox Talk|
post_info = [[User:Xylaquin|Xylaquin]] 14:47, 17 August 2007 (EDT)|
post = Biggest archive to date XD
}}

==Chat Archives==
Ever so often when the page gets big, it is cut and pasted into these archives and the chat page is clean for more chat!
*[[Chat:18/8/6-14/10/6]]
*[[Chat:14/10/6-1/12/6]]
*[[Chat:1/12/6-27/12/6]]
*[[Chat:20/1/7-24/4/7]]
*[[Chat:28/4/7-17/6/7]]
*[[Chat:19/6/7-16/8/7]]

Chinese

DSRPS3 — Sat, 06 Oct 2007 13:37:30 GMT

DSRPS3:

{{Infobox Map|
name = Chinese|
image = http://www.igz.it/dep/recensioni/timesplitters/time2.jpg|
size = Medium|
location = In and round & about a Chinese Restaurant|
climate = Night|
unlocked = Unlocked by Default|
rec_bot_set = '''TS2''' [[Jake Fenton]] [[Bear]] [[Khallos]] [[Chinese Chef]] [[Viola]] [[Jacque de la Morte]] [[Leo Krupps]] [[Insect Mutant]] [[Slick Tommy]] [[Mr. Underwood]] '''TSFP''' [[Ninja Monkey]] [[Time Assassin Cortez]] [[Chinese Chef]] [[Duckman Drake]] [[Calamari]] [[Time Assassin]] [[The Master]] [[Carrion Carcass]] [[Gaston Boucher]] [[Amy Chen]]|
rec_wep_set = '''TS2''' [[Silenced Pistol (x2)]] [[Shotgun]] [[Tommy Gun]] [[Grenade Launcher]] [[Tommy Gun (x2)]] '''TSFP''' [[Pistol 9mm]] [[Injector]] [[Tactical 12-Gauge]] [[Grenade]]s [[Proximity Mine]]s [[Machine Gun (x2)]]|
}}

Perhaps one of the most (if not the most) famous maps from the series, Chinese features a good balance of indoor areas and outdoor action. It is set at a Chinese restaurant and includes the gardens round about it. The main action points of the map are in the kitchen and around the garden. Chinese also features an [[Easter Egg]]: in the reception room there is a gong which can be punched or fired upon to make it sound.

== Appearence ==
Chinese appears in all three games however in each it changes it's appearence. In [[TimeSplitters|TS1]] the colour of the curtains on the walls and the lamps are red, there is a chair in the basement but no tunnel.

In [[TimeSplitters 2]], the colour scheme is green (posing that there is a new year) and one of the cupboards in the basement has moved.

In [[TimeSplitters: Future Perfect|TSFP]], there is a tunnel connection the basement to outside as well as the chair being gone.

All versions have the same layout (bar the tunnel from TSFP). The main lobby is a moderatly open room with a gong at the end. Upstairs progresses to two dining rooms with chinese decor. Each dining room has a door that leads to some toilets. One of the dining room's door also leads the the kitchen; the other dining room leads to an auxiliary room (it's purpose is unknown). The kitchen leads to the basement as well as each side of the outdoor passageway.

The outside section consists of a perimeter passeway, an oriental garden and a small open building next to it.

== Story ==
Chinese's role in TS1's [[Story]] features [[Harry Tipper]]'s and [[Lt. Christine Malone]]'s debut. Set in 1970, Tipper is a Detective set to retrieve an important suitcase (presumably containing evidence). The restaurant itself is called ''Orientals'', and is the headquarters of [[Mr. Big|Mr. Big's]] chinese gang. It is unknown whether the whole staff of Orientals are in the gang, or whether they have some kind of allegiance towards them, since they fire at Harry Tipper.

[[Category:Maps - Medium]]

Glitches

DSRPS3 — Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:24:02 GMT

DSRPS3:

Capture the Bag

DSRPS3 — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 14:04:01 GMT

DSRPS3:

In '''Capture the Bag''', each team has their own "Bag Base." The objective is to steal the other team's bag and return to their own base, scoring points. The team with the most points at the end wins the match. If a character dies, they drop the bag. If an opponent retrieves the bag, it returns to the Bag Base. If a character on the human's team retrieves the bag, then they can continue to run with it until they die or bring the bag back to their base. A player cannot score if their own team's bag has been stolen. If this happens, a bot will simply circle the base until he or she is killed or their bag is retrieved. The game is similar to Capture the Flag from other [[FPS]] games.

In TS1 the mode has four bag bases.
{{Mode}}

Escort

DSRPS3 — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:52:19 GMT

DSRPS3:

'''Escort''' is one of the arcade modes in the original Timesplitters game. The [[Chemical Plant]] level, the [[spaceship]] level, the [[spaceways]] level, the [[Streets]] level, the [[graveyard]] level,the [[bank]] level and the [[docks]] level, where the only levels to feature this game mode

==Objective ==

The player had to protect a selected bot from damage by the other team. The player could only be on the defenders (blue) team, never the attackers (red).

==Controversy==

This is among the harder of play options in TS1, such as [[Last Stand]]. What makes it so hard is the fact that players are very sensitive to damage including the escortee, unlike in the sequel, [[TimeSplitters 2]]. This, like Last Stand and Knockout, has not been featured in any other TS games since TS1.

{{Mode}}

Escort

DSRPS3 — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:51:39 GMT

DSRPS3:

'''Escort''' is one of the arcade modes in the original Timesplitters game. The [[Chemical plant]] level, the [[spaceship]] level, the [[spaceways]] level, the [[Streets]] level, the [[graveyard]] level,the [[bank]] level and the [[docks]] level, where the only levels to feature this game mode

==Objective ==

The player had to protect a selected bot from damage by the other team. The player could only be on the defenders (blue) team, never the attackers (red).

==Controversy==

This is among the harder of play options in TS1, such as [[Last Stand]]. What makes it so hard is the fact that players are very sensitive to damage including the escortee, unlike in the sequel, [[TimeSplitters 2]]. This, like Last Stand and Knockout, has not been featured in any other TS games since TS1.

{{Mode}}

Escort

DSRPS3 — Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:49:57 GMT

DSRPS3:

'''Escort''' is one of the arcade modes in the original Timesplitters game. The [[chemical plant]] level, the [[spaceship]] level, the [[spaceways]] level, the [[Streets]] level, the [[graveyard]] level,the [[bank]] level and the [[docks]] level, where the only levels to feature this game mode

==Objective ==

The player had to protect a selected bot from damage by the other team. The player could only be on the defenders (blue) team, never the attackers (red).

==Controversy==

This is among the harder of play options in TS1, such as [[Last Stand]]. What makes it so hard is the fact that players are very sensitive to damage including the escortee, unlike in the sequel, [[TimeSplitters 2]]. This, like Last Stand and Knockout, has not been featured in any other TS games since TS1.

{{Mode}}