Talk:397

From Nomicapolis

Proposed by: chuck 11:03, 30 May 2007 (EDT)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

I don't like the "wholly void" part; I think it should just be a simple rule of precedence in interpretation, letting the rest of the conflicting rule stand. I don't really like immutable rules anyway. And this is mostly to make myself active again per 362.

Debate

Add comments

Debate closed by chuck 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT) -- the proposal must now be voted on.

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

1. chuck 11:07, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
2. BobTHJ 12:54, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
3. --Tucana25 00:08, 31 May 2007 (EDT)

Against

Add AGAINST vote

Abstain

Add Abstention