Talk:393

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Opened for voting, vote For)
(For)
Line 18: Line 18:
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 14:09, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
# [[User:BobTHJ|BobTHJ]] 14:09, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
 +
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:43, 30 May 2007 (EDT)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
 +
=== Against ===
=== Against ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}

Revision as of 03:43, 31 May 2007

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary


The first step in a minor redefinition of Proposals. The goal would be to broaden the definition of a proposal to include a one-time Order to be executed upon passage of the proposal. Also, if there is interest, I wouldn't mind broadening the definition of a proposal to allow for multiple rule changes & repeals in the same proposal (this would make it easier to make a large change in one proposal that would effect several rules). It would probably need to be coupled with a revised numbering system. BobTHJ 11:33, 22 May 2007 (EDT)

Debate

Add comments

hear hear...--Tucana25 08:17, 23 May 2007 (EDT)


Vote

Discussion is closed. This Proposal must now be voted on BobTHJ 14:09, 24 May 2007 (EDT)

For

Add FOR vote

  1. BobTHJ 14:09, 24 May 2007 (EDT)
  2. --Tucana25 23:43, 30 May 2007 (EDT)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Abstain

Add Abstention


Personal tools