Talk:Decisions of the Judge
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | {| border="2" cellpadding="4" style="text-align:left" align="right" | ||
| + | ! '''Archived Discussion''' | ||
| + | |- | ||
| + | | [[Talk:Decisions of the Judge/Dec06|Decisions of the Judge/Dec06]] | ||
| + | | | ||
| + | |} | ||
| + | |||
I request a Judgement on whether Proposal 357 should have failed. According to Rule [[326]], section 2, a proposal in those set of circumstances is 'dismissed', and it is not clear whether this is the same as failing for the purposes of scoring. Should [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] have lost 10 points? --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:05, 5 January 2007 (EST) | I request a Judgement on whether Proposal 357 should have failed. According to Rule [[326]], section 2, a proposal in those set of circumstances is 'dismissed', and it is not clear whether this is the same as failing for the purposes of scoring. Should [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] have lost 10 points? --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:05, 5 January 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 16:40, 5 January 2007
| Archived Discussion | |
|---|---|
| Decisions of the Judge/Dec06 |
I request a Judgement on whether Proposal 357 should have failed. According to Rule 326, section 2, a proposal in those set of circumstances is 'dismissed', and it is not clear whether this is the same as failing for the purposes of scoring. Should Applejuicefool have lost 10 points? --Finisterre 06:05, 5 January 2007 (EST)
