Talk:349
From Nomicapolis
(→For) |
(→Against) |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
=== Against === | === Against === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=5 Add AGAINST vote] | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:35, 20 December 2006 (EST) (Because everyone voted against [[337]] which was the same idea)<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> |
| - | + | ===Abstain ===<!--DO NOT REMOVE--> | |
| - | + | [http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=6 Add Abstention] | |
| - | + | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | |
| - | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--> | + | |
| - | + | ||
| - | <!-- | + | |
__NOEDITSECTION__ | __NOEDITSECTION__ | ||
Revision as of 16:35, 20 December 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate for this Proposal shall end December 9, 2006 at 00:01 EST.
This proposal will make it easier to define quorum should that become necessary in the future.
This proposal has been changed to address concerns listed in the debate.
Debate for this Proposal shall be extended to December 10, 2006 at 00:01 EST
Debate for this Proposal shall be extended to December 12, 2006 at 00:01 EST
Debate for this Proposal shall be extended to December 18, 2006 at 00:01 EST
OK...I've combined some stuff. --Tucana25 15:23, 19 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
This proposal, if unchanged and adopted, will conflict with 207 as well as 319. I would suggest that this proposal be changed to an amendment to 319. --Simulacrum 01:48, 6 December 2006 (EST)
This proposal also as proposed means an inactive player can never become active until less than 3 players are playing. Since you have to be active to vote and you have to vote to achieve active status. --Dayd 23:04, 8 December 2006 (EST)
Curses...I forgot that neither of those proposals passed...more editing to come...
Vote
Debate is now over. Please Vote. --Tucana25 15:23, 19 December 2006 (EST)
For
Against
Abstain
