Talk:346
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | <!--BEGIN DEBATE--> | ||
| - | <!--END DEBATE--> | + | The wording of the fractional vote (and i understand why) almost suggests that if it is not your proposal, you could cast 1/2 your vote FOR, with 1/2 AGAINST, or 75/25, etc. I could support the proposal's passing, yet still be awarded points for voting against. This is a moot point if it is determined that it cannot be interpreted this way. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 12:09, 6 December 2006 (EST)<!--END DEBATE--> |
== Vote == | == Vote == | ||
Revision as of 17:09, 6 December 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Those who make proposals should be obliged to vote for them. Debate on this proposal will end at 9 p.m. (EST) Dec. 7, 2006. Applejuicefool 11:45, 4 December 2006 (EST)
Made minor wording changes to replace "proposer of a rule" with "proposer of a rule-change". Applejuicefool 12:01, 6 December 2006 (EST)
Debate
The wording of the fractional vote (and i understand why) almost suggests that if it is not your proposal, you could cast 1/2 your vote FOR, with 1/2 AGAINST, or 75/25, etc. I could support the proposal's passing, yet still be awarded points for voting against. This is a moot point if it is determined that it cannot be interpreted this way. --Tucana25 12:09, 6 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
