Talk:319

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 01:50, 16 November 2006 (view source) Applejuicefool (Talk | contribs) ← Previous diff		Revision as of 21:48, 16 November 2006 (view source) Shivan (Talk | contribs) Next diff →
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	Sorry for the spam - I thought better of this rule proposal (it's effectively covered by other rules). Please delete this discussion when you propose the "for real" 319. [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 20:50, 15 November 2006 (EST)	+	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
		+	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
		+	After having defined inactivity I hereby set fourth three sanctions against those who are inactive. I'm very open to suggestions on this one.<br>
		+	--[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 16:48, 16 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Debate ==
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
		+	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
		+
		+
		+	<!--END DEBATE-->
		+
		+	== Vote ==
		+	=== For ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
		+	# <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
		+	=== Against ===
		+	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
		+	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+
		+	__NOEDITSECTION__

---

Revision as of 21:48, 16 November 2006

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against

Proposer's summary and declarations

After having defined inactivity I hereby set fourth three sanctions against those who are inactive. I'm very open to suggestions on this one.
--Shivan 16:48, 16 November 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

Vote

For

Add FOR vote

1. 
   

Against

Add AGAINST vote