Talk:310
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→For) |
(→For) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
# [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 07:40, 22 April 2006 (PDT) | # [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 07:40, 22 April 2006 (PDT) | ||
| + | # [[User:Pugrins|Pugrins]] 16:53, 9 May 2006 (PDT) | ||
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
Revision as of 23:53, 9 May 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This amendment gives us the ability to allow plurality votes in the case where we have three or more options, such as if we enact a Governor General title and there are more than two contenders.
Debate
Add comments
Looks good to me. Simulacrum 20:19, 18 April 2006 (PDT)
Vote
For
- Applejuicefool 07:40, 22 April 2006 (PDT)
- Pugrins 16:53, 9 May 2006 (PDT)
Against
