Talk:349
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
This proposal, if unchanged and adopted, will conflict with [[207]] as well as [[319]]. I would suggest that this proposal be changed to an amendment to [[319]]. --[[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 01:48, 6 December 2006 (EST) | This proposal, if unchanged and adopted, will conflict with [[207]] as well as [[319]]. I would suggest that this proposal be changed to an amendment to [[319]]. --[[User:Simulacrum|Simulacrum]] 01:48, 6 December 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | This proposal also as proposed means an inactive player can never become active until less than 3 players are playing. Since you have to be active to vote and you have to vote to achieve active status. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 23:04, 8 December 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 04:04, 9 December 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
Debate for this Proposal shall end December 9, 2006 at 00:01 EST.
This proposal will make it easier to define quorum should that become necessary in the future.
This proposal has been changed to address concerns listed in the debate.
Debate for this Proposal shall be extended to December 10, 2006 at 00:01 EST
Debate
This proposal, if unchanged and adopted, will conflict with 207 as well as 319. I would suggest that this proposal be changed to an amendment to 319. --Simulacrum 01:48, 6 December 2006 (EST)
This proposal also as proposed means an inactive player can never become active until less than 3 players are playing. Since you have to be active to vote and you have to vote to achieve active status. --Dayd 23:04, 8 December 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
