Talk:332
From Nomicapolis
(→Debate) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
This proposal is to limit the ammout of proposals to help from overwhelming Players. Also it is to encourage quality over quantity in proposals. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 15:43, 25 November 2006 (EST) | This proposal is to limit the ammout of proposals to help from overwhelming Players. Also it is to encourage quality over quantity in proposals. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 15:43, 25 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have changed it from 2 to 3 and will be bring it to an immediate vote. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:06, 27 November 2006 (EST) | ||
== Debate == | == Debate == | ||
| Line 26: | Line 28: | ||
=== For === | === For === | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=4 Add FOR vote] | ||
| - | # <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | + | # --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 11:06, 27 November 2006 (EST) |
| + | #<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE--> | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | <!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br /> | ||
Revision as of 16:06, 27 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This proposal is to limit the ammout of proposals to help from overwhelming Players. Also it is to encourage quality over quantity in proposals. --Dayd 15:43, 25 November 2006 (EST)
I have changed it from 2 to 3 and will be bring it to an immediate vote. --Dayd 11:06, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
I am for it. --Tucana25 00:01, 26 November 2006 (EST)
This rule would be better after we have more players. Right now, it is not hard to stay on top of the proposals out there, and if we limit the number of proposals a player may have, we will drive away those players that like to remain very active. I certainly wouldn't want to play a game that would limit my activity. If you think a proposal is of poor quality, simply vote "against" it. --TomFoolery 07:55, 26 November 2006 (EST)
If there must be a limit, let is be more. At least 3.--Shivan 07:31, 27 November 2006 (EST)
I agree with Shivan. 3 would be a good number. Applejuicefool 10:39, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
- --Dayd 11:06, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Against
