Talk:332
From Nomicapolis
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) (→Debate) |
(→Debate) |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
This rule would be better after we have more players. Right now, it is not hard to stay on top of the proposals out there, and if we limit the number of proposals a player may have, we will drive away those players that like to remain very active. I certainly wouldn't want to play a game that would limit my activity. If you think a proposal is of poor quality, simply vote "against" it. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 07:55, 26 November 2006 (EST) | This rule would be better after we have more players. Right now, it is not hard to stay on top of the proposals out there, and if we limit the number of proposals a player may have, we will drive away those players that like to remain very active. I certainly wouldn't want to play a game that would limit my activity. If you think a proposal is of poor quality, simply vote "against" it. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 07:55, 26 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | <br> | ||
| + | If there must be a limit, let is be more. At least 3.--[[User:Shivan|Shivan]] 07:31, 27 November 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 12:31, 27 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This proposal is to limit the ammout of proposals to help from overwhelming Players. Also it is to encourage quality over quantity in proposals. --Dayd 15:43, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
I am for it. --Tucana25 00:01, 26 November 2006 (EST)
This rule would be better after we have more players. Right now, it is not hard to stay on top of the proposals out there, and if we limit the number of proposals a player may have, we will drive away those players that like to remain very active. I certainly wouldn't want to play a game that would limit my activity. If you think a proposal is of poor quality, simply vote "against" it. --TomFoolery 07:55, 26 November 2006 (EST)
If there must be a limit, let is be more. At least 3.--Shivan 07:31, 27 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
