Talk:331
From Nomicapolis
(Difference between revisions)
(→Debate) |
TomFoolery (Talk | contribs) (→Debate) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Currently all Immutable rules start with a 1. Also on the [[Current_ruleset|Current ruleset]] page all the Immutable rules are listed in the table of contents and are located at the top of the page. I see no reason why we need this rule. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 15:52, 25 November 2006 (EST) | Currently all Immutable rules start with a 1. Also on the [[Current_ruleset|Current ruleset]] page all the Immutable rules are listed in the table of contents and are located at the top of the page. I see no reason why we need this rule. --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 15:52, 25 November 2006 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | But it is possible to transmute rules, and per [[108]] they would receive a 300 level number. So a currently mutable rule, transmuted by a 300 level proposal would have a 300 level number and no indication in the current ruleset that it is immutable. --[[User:TomFoolery|TomFoolery]] 17:41, 25 November 2006 (EST) | ||
<!--END DEBATE--> | <!--END DEBATE--> | ||
Revision as of 22:41, 25 November 2006
Contents |
Proposer's summary and declarations
This would make it easier to see which rules are immutable on the Current_ruleset. --TomFoolery 10:54, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Currently all Immutable rules start with a 1. Also on the Current ruleset page all the Immutable rules are listed in the table of contents and are located at the top of the page. I see no reason why we need this rule. --Dayd 15:52, 25 November 2006 (EST)
But it is possible to transmute rules, and per 108 they would receive a 300 level number. So a currently mutable rule, transmuted by a 300 level proposal would have a 300 level number and no indication in the current ruleset that it is immutable. --TomFoolery 17:41, 25 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
