Talk:303

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(fixed formating)
Line 10: Line 10:
: Good point. I'll take a look at how I can fix it when I get home tonight. [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 09:18, 10 April 2006 (PDT)
: Good point. I'll take a look at how I can fix it when I get home tonight. [[User:Sinblox|sinblox]] 09:18, 10 April 2006 (PDT)
 +
 +
Umm...so if it gains enough "against" votes to be defeated, any player may add it to the list of rules? So what's the point of voting it down? [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 21:52, 12 April 2006 (PDT)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->

Revision as of 04:52, 13 April 2006

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

This is a proposal to add some structure to the way we vote. If you can figure out anyway to format the proposals subsections to look a bit nicer/easier to read that would be appreciated.

Debate

Add comments

Per 210, rule 111 will take precedence if certain criteria is being met. However, I do not see a conflict and I would support this proposal. I do have a suggestion... switch the text in section 2 with section 3.

Good point. I'll take a look at how I can fix it when I get home tonight. sinblox 09:18, 10 April 2006 (PDT)

Umm...so if it gains enough "against" votes to be defeated, any player may add it to the list of rules? So what's the point of voting it down? Applejuicefool 21:52, 12 April 2006 (PDT)


Vote

For

Add FOR vote


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Personal tools