325

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
 
(4 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
-
{{Proposed rule}}
+
{{Failed proposal}}
--[[User:Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 13:16, 23 November 2006 (EST)
--[[User:Tom Foolery|Tom Foolery]] 13:16, 23 November 2006 (EST)
Rule [[311]] is hereby amended to read, in entirety:
Rule [[311]] is hereby amended to read, in entirety:
-
A majority is required to approve or amend any rule. A super-majority is required to repeal any rule. Any new rule that negates a previous rule is considered a repeal of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.
+
#A simple majority is required to approve any new rule.  
 +
#A super-majority is required to repeal or amend any rule.  
 +
#Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing it or by eliminating its entire effect is considered a repeal of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.
 +
#Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing, or by eliminating part of its effect is considered an amendment of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.

Current revision as of 16:08, 29 November 2006

This proposal has failed.
It is kept for historical purposes. See why it failed on the discussion page.

--Tom Foolery 13:16, 23 November 2006 (EST)

Rule 311 is hereby amended to read, in entirety:

  1. A simple majority is required to approve any new rule.
  2. A super-majority is required to repeal or amend any rule.
  3. Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing it or by eliminating its entire effect is considered a repeal of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.
  4. Any new rule that negates a previous rule by removing, or by eliminating part of its effect is considered an amendment of the previous rule, and as such, requires a super-majority to pass.
Personal tools