Talk:374

From Nomicapolis

Revision as of 06:26, 22 January 2007 (view source) Tucana25 (Talk | contribs) (→Debate) ← Previous diff		Current revision as of 14:08, 23 January 2007 (view source) Dayd (Talk | contribs)
(3 intermediate revisions not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-	Proposed by: [[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)	+	I declare this proposal passed --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 09:08, 23 January 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	Proposed by: [[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)
	<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->
Line 20:		Line 22:
	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
		+	Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# --[[User:Dayd|Dayd]] 01:28, 22 January 2007 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 01:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:Finisterre|Finisterre]] 06:04, 22 January 2007 (EST)
		+	#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}

---

Current revision as of 14:08, 23 January 2007

I declare this proposal passed --Dayd 09:08, 23 January 2007 (EST)

  Proposed by: Dayd 01:17, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Contents 1 Proposer's summary and declarations 2 Debate 3 Vote 3.1 For 3.2 Against 3.3 Abstain

Proposer's summary and declarations

Proposer's summary

Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 29 January 2007 (EST)
This rule is intended to declare all new players active when they start. Currently how I read the rules is since they haven't voted or debated in the last 2 weeks regardless if they've been here or not that makes them inactive. Also just made it a rule that you can make offensive names. Since there's a rule guiding calling someone out for breaking the rules this will now give guidance if that problem ever arises. So I might be offended by the name DaydsuxEggs, while everyone else might be fine with it I'll at least be able to seek a claim from the judge. --Dayd 01:25, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Debate

Add comments

I've wanted to do that to differentiate between new players and reactivating yourself. Lets vote on this ASAP. I'm for it. --Tucana25 01:20, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Hee hee...daydsuxeggs...--Tucana25 01:26, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on

For

Add FOR vote

1. --Dayd 01:28, 22 January 2007 (EST)
2. --Tucana25 01:38, 22 January 2007 (EST)
3. --Finisterre 06:04, 22 January 2007 (EST)

Against

Add AGAINST vote

Abstain

Add Abstention