Talk:344

From Nomicapolis

(Difference between revisions)
(Proposer's summary and declarations)
Line 8: Line 8:
This proposal combines elements from Rules [[314]] and [[319]].  It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status.  Rule [[111]] seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules.  If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier.  I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST)
This proposal combines elements from Rules [[314]] and [[319]].  It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status.  Rule [[111]] seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules.  If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier.  I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST)
-
 
+
== Debate ==
== Debate ==
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=2 Add comments]
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
 +
As there seems to be no debate, I will open this to voting. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
<!--END DEBATE-->
<!--END DEBATE-->
== Vote ==
== Vote ==
 +
Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
=== For ===
=== For ===
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
 +
# --[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Revision as of 04:15, 3 December 2006

Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}}
When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.

Contents

Proposer's summary and declarations

Debate will end for this proposal on Monday December 4, 2006 at 12:01 AM EST.

This proposal combines elements from Rules 314 and 319. It addresses concerns I have regarding the process of declaring inactive status as well as returning a player to active status. Rule 111 seems to suggest that players should avoid combining two or more rule-changes in one amendment, but there are no rules preventing proposals from amending or repealing multiple rules. If anyone can find evidence to the contrary, I would be happy to split this into multiple proposals, but this seemed easier. I have explained my reasoning for proposing these rule changes in other places, but I would be happy to expound upon them if anyone missed them the first time or would prefer I state them here for archiving purposes. Let me know. --Tucana25 21:17, 1 December 2006 (EST)

Debate

Add comments As there seems to be no debate, I will open this to voting. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)


Vote

Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)

For

Add FOR vote

  1. --Tucana25 23:15, 2 December 2006 (EST)


Against

Add AGAINST vote


Personal tools