Talk:340
From Nomicapolis
 (→Proposer's summary and declarations)  | 
		 (→Debate)  | 
		||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
== Debate ==  | == Debate ==  | ||
<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments]  | <!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit§ion=2 Add comments]  | ||
| + | |||
<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->  | <!--BEGIN DEBATE-->  | ||
| + | Problems I see:   | ||
| + | Clause 1: "Popular vote" is not defined by Nomicapolis rules.  If [[330]] passes, the term "population" (related to popular) will be defined. This will make a "popular vote" a vote of the Citizens, not us.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clause 2: The pronoun "they" has no antecedent.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clause 3.1: "Not all positions will be voted on every month," could be taken to mean that it is a violation of the rules to vote on all positions every month.   | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clause 3.2: I'm uncomfortable with the usage of "in writing." We're not actually writing these things, we're typing or posting them.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clause 3.3: Replace "representatives" with "officials".  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Clause 4: Requires an "emergency vote" without a reason (perhaps "A player who becomes inactive loses any official positions they may have held."?). Protocol is misspelled.  | ||
| + | |||
| + | Discuss! [[User:Applejuicefool|Applejuicefool]] 11:12, 29 November 2006 (EST)  | ||
| + | |||
<!--END DEBATE-->  | <!--END DEBATE-->  | ||
Revision as of 16:12, 29 November 2006
Please substitute this template. To do so add subst: in the template call. This is how it should look typed: {{subst:vote}} 
 When it is fixed please remove these instructions by editing the page normally.
Contents | 
Proposer's summary and declarations
Proposer: Add your summary here
Feedback is welcome. I know that one problem is how to address what happens if there become less active players than elected positions. Hopefully, that never becomes an issue, but feedback would be appreciated. --Tucana25 00:30, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Debate
Problems I see: Clause 1: "Popular vote" is not defined by Nomicapolis rules. If 330 passes, the term "population" (related to popular) will be defined. This will make a "popular vote" a vote of the Citizens, not us.
Clause 2: The pronoun "they" has no antecedent.
Clause 3.1: "Not all positions will be voted on every month," could be taken to mean that it is a violation of the rules to vote on all positions every month.
Clause 3.2: I'm uncomfortable with the usage of "in writing." We're not actually writing these things, we're typing or posting them.
Clause 3.3: Replace "representatives" with "officials".
Clause 4: Requires an "emergency vote" without a reason (perhaps "A player who becomes inactive loses any official positions they may have held."?). Protocol is misspelled.
Discuss! Applejuicefool 11:12, 29 November 2006 (EST)
Vote
For
Against
