Talk:Judge Election - Revision history

Applejuicefool: Vote Closed

Applejuicefool — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 03:57:07 GMT

Vote Closed

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:57, 1 December 2006
Line 38:		Line 38:
	#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 23:02, 29 November 2006 (EST)		# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 23:02, 29 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	== Vote Closed ==
		+
		+	I declare this election closed. Applejuicefool has been elected judge in the November special election. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 22:57, 30 November 2006 (EST)

Tucana25: /* Nominations */

Tucana25 — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:41:34 GMT

Nominations

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:41, 1 December 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:

	I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)		I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)
-	~~I nominate [[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 21:40, 30 November 2006 (EST)~~

	==Vote==		==Vote==

Tucana25: /* Nominations */

Tucana25 — Fri, 01 Dec 2006 02:40:51 GMT

Nominations

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 1 December 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:

	I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)		I nominate [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 11:05, 25 November 2006 (EST)
		+	I nominate [[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 21:40, 30 November 2006 (EST)

	==Vote==		==Vote==

Applejuicefool: /* Vote */

Applejuicefool — Thu, 30 Nov 2006 04:02:59 GMT

Vote

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 30 November 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:
	#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)
	#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 23:02, 29 November 2006 (EST)

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

Applejuicefool — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:28:23 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:28, 29 November 2006
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I think 4 votes is enough to decide this election. Now what...? Also I am going to propose a rule regarding elections. Since it seemed the natural thing to do here, i will include the nomination process used here in my proposal. Congrats AJF. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:15, 28 November 2006 (EST)		I think 4 votes is enough to decide this election. Now what...? Also I am going to propose a rule regarding elections. Since it seemed the natural thing to do here, i will include the nomination process used here in my proposal. Congrats AJF. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:15, 28 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	I appreciate everyone who has cast their vote in support of me in this Judge election. Thank you very much. However, by my reading, I am not Judge yet. Please hold off on requesting judgements until a Judge has officially been elected. I appreciate it once again, and I will do my best to make the game better when I do take office. Thanks, [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 00:28, 29 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Tucana25: /* Debate */

Tucana25 — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:15:23 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:15, 29 November 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:
	Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted." That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed. I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)		Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted." That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed. I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)

		+	I think 4 votes is enough to decide this election. Now what...? Also I am going to propose a rule regarding elections. Since it seemed the natural thing to do here, i will include the nomination process used here in my proposal. Congrats AJF. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:15, 28 November 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Tucana25: /* Vote */

Tucana25 — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:10:52 GMT

Vote

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 29 November 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:
	#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
	#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)
		+	#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)

Tucana25: /* Debate */

Tucana25 — Wed, 29 Nov 2006 04:09:55 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:09, 29 November 2006
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Since a position has never been voted on before, there are no rules about how to do it. [[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] voted already, so I will follow suit, only to ensure that a quorum is met. [[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)		Since a position has never been voted on before, there are no rules about how to do it. [[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] voted already, so I will follow suit, only to ensure that a quorum is met. [[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+
		+	Based on the text of rule [[321]], actually...i believe there is a typo or grammatical mistake...but anyway: (if?) "At any time there is not an active player as judge a special vote for a new Judge will be immediately conducted." That meant that the vote began at the moment the law passed. I would also like to propose (unofficially, i guess) that should AJF be elected they be allowed to continue as Judge for the month of December instead of holding an additional vote on Dec 1. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:06, 28 November 2006 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Simulacrum: /* Vote */

Simulacrum — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 04:52:04 GMT

Vote

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 28 November 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:
	#--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)
	#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
-	#	+	#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)

TomFoolery: /* Debate */

TomFoolery — Mon, 27 Nov 2006 15:34:29 GMT

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:34, 27 November 2006
Line 11:		Line 11:
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->

-	~~NOTE: The link above is messed up. Please fix, then delete this note (I'd do it, but I'm not sure how).~~

	I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)		I humbly accept the nomination made by TomFoolery; thanks for your confidence, Tom. If elected, I pledge to listen to and consider input from active players before making my decision, to abide by the letter of the rules in question, and, where those rules fail to indicate a clear and straightforward decision, to take into account the betterment of Nomicapolis as a whole in forming my ruling. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 12:01, 25 November 2006 (EST)

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:02, 30 November 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:
	#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)
	#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 23:02, 29 November 2006 (EST)

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:10, 29 November 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:
	#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
	#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)
		+	#--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:10, 28 November 2006 (EST)

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:52, 28 November 2006
Line 29:		Line 29:
	#--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:Shivan\|Shivan]] 07:43, 27 November 2006 (EST)
	#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)		#--[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 10:33, 27 November 2006 (EST)
-	#	+	#--[[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:52, 27 November 2006 (EST)