Talk:348 - Revision history

Tucana25 at 16:26, 21 December 2006

Tucana25 — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 16:26:00 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 21 December 2006
Line 4:		Line 4:

	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->		<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
		+
		+	I declare this proposal failed. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 11:26, 21 December 2006 (EST)
	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==		== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
	[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006." This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time. Looking for information if the wording is good. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)		[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006." This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time. Looking for information if the wording is good. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)

TomFoolery: /* Against */

TomFoolery — Tue, 19 Dec 2006 17:27:12 GMT

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 19 December 2006
Line 36:		Line 36:
	# [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 10:31, 15 December 2006 (EST) (The "otherwise references" clause is much too restrictive. Sorry I didn't catch this in debate.)		# [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 10:31, 15 December 2006 (EST) (The "otherwise references" clause is much too restrictive. Sorry I didn't catch this in debate.)
	#[[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] 10:18, 17 December 2006 (EST)		#[[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] 10:18, 17 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 12:27, 19 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Mike Rosoft: Vote: 348 - against

Mike Rosoft — Sun, 17 Dec 2006 15:18:36 GMT

Vote: 348 - against

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:18, 17 December 2006
Line 35:		Line 35:
	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:17, 12 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:17, 12 December 2006 (EST)
	# [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 10:31, 15 December 2006 (EST) (The "otherwise references" clause is much too restrictive. Sorry I didn't catch this in debate.)		# [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 10:31, 15 December 2006 (EST) (The "otherwise references" clause is much too restrictive. Sorry I didn't catch this in debate.)
		+	#[[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] 10:18, 17 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Simulacrum: /* For */

Simulacrum — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 04:55:58 GMT

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:55, 16 December 2006
Line 26:		Line 26:
	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 19:19, 12 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 19:19, 12 December 2006 (EST)
	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:11, 14 December 2006 (EST)		# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:11, 14 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Simulacrum\|Simulacrum]] 23:55, 15 December 2006 (EST)
	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Chuck: /* Against */

Chuck — Fri, 15 Dec 2006 15:31:43 GMT

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:31, 15 December 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:17, 12 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:17, 12 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 10:31, 15 December 2006 (EST) (The "otherwise references" clause is much too restrictive. Sorry I didn't catch this in debate.)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Applejuicefool: /* For */

Applejuicefool — Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:11:08 GMT

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 14 December 2006
Line 25:		Line 25:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 19:19, 12 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 19:19, 12 December 2006 (EST)
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:11, 14 December 2006 (EST)
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]

Tucana25: /* Against */

Tucana25 — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 04:17:21 GMT

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 13 December 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
		+	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:17, 12 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Dayd at 00:19, 13 December 2006

Dayd — Wed, 13 Dec 2006 00:19:56 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 00:19, 13 December 2006
Line 21:		Line 21:

	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
		+	Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 19:19, 12 December 2006 (EST)
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
		+	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 19:19, 12 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Mike Rosoft: Response regarding proposal 348

Mike Rosoft — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 14:05:15 GMT

Response regarding proposal 348

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:05, 8 December 2006
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I also added this proposal to the current events on the front page. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:26, 5 December 2006 (EST)		I also added this proposal to the current events on the front page. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:26, 5 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Should the same rule be both amended and repealed, the intended result is that it should remain repealed, either before or after the amendment; in the latter case, the repealing proposal should follow to its new number and not try to abolish a non-existent rule; in the former one, the proposal to amend it becomes moot because a repealed rule cannot be amended. The current rules do not seem to count with this possibility; I have prepared [[User:Mike Rosoft/drafts#Update of references\|a draft]] to deal with the situation. - [[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] 09:05, 8 December 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd: /* Proposer's summary and declarations */

Dayd — Wed, 06 Dec 2006 19:02:25 GMT

Proposer's summary and declarations

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:02, 6 December 2006
Line 6:		Line 6:
	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==		== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
	[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006." This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time. Looking for information if the wording is good. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)		[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=1 Proposer's summary]"Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00pm EST 17 DEC 2006." This is intended to end proposals that amend the same rule at the same time. Looking for information if the wording is good. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:19, 5 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Another intent is so that player A doesn't: amend 400 as such while player B: repeal 400. Well what happens if both pass. What happens if B passes before A?

	== Debate ==		== Debate ==