Nomicapolis:Community Portal - Revision history

203.145.131.158: /* Initial ruleset discussion */

203.145.131.158 — Thu, 21 Jun 2007 11:16:58 GMT

Initial ruleset discussion

←Older revision		Revision as of 11:16, 21 June 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	General discussions about this wiki should be placed here.		General discussions about this wiki should be placed here.

-	~~==Initial ruleset discussion==~~	+	Dis website is Great!
-	~~Discussion moved~~ [[~~Nomicapolis~~:~~Initial ruleset~~\|~~here]~~].	+	I will recommend you to all my friends.
		+	Thank you.
		+
		+	[http://z.la/7kadb black tranny] \|
		+	[http://z.la/2kshu teen lesbians] \|
		+	[http://z.la/27w3o soccer mom] \|
		+	[http://z.la/ivuj1 old young]

	==Logo Contest==		==Logo Contest==

BobTHJ: /* Passed proposals added to Announcements template */ response

BobTHJ — Wed, 23 May 2007 19:07:59 GMT

Passed proposals added to Announcements template: response

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:07, 23 May 2007
Line 25:		Line 25:
	==Passed proposals added to Announcements template==		==Passed proposals added to Announcements template==
	Hey guys, I'd like to request that when passed proposals are moved to the New Rules section on the Announcements template that they not have the scores added to them, as it makes it harder to catch which ones I still need to add the points for; if they've got no scoring information after them they're immediately obvious that they need to be done. Thanks! [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:06, 23 May 2007 (EDT)		Hey guys, I'd like to request that when passed proposals are moved to the New Rules section on the Announcements template that they not have the scores added to them, as it makes it harder to catch which ones I still need to add the points for; if they've got no scoring information after them they're immediately obvious that they need to be done. Thanks! [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:06, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	: Sure thing, sorry! [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 15:07, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

Wooble: request to not add scoring information to New Rules

Wooble — Wed, 23 May 2007 18:06:06 GMT

request to not add scoring information to New Rules

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:06, 23 May 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)		:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
	:: I think the [[All rules]] page looks great, and I'm all for the use of Transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] as well. [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 17:15, 10 May 2007 (EDT)		:: I think the [[All rules]] page looks great, and I'm all for the use of Transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] as well. [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 17:15, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	==Passed proposals added to Announcements template==
		+	Hey guys, I'd like to request that when passed proposals are moved to the New Rules section on the Announcements template that they not have the scores added to them, as it makes it harder to catch which ones I still need to add the points for; if they've got no scoring information after them they're immediately obvious that they need to be done. Thanks! [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:06, 23 May 2007 (EDT)

BobTHJ: response

BobTHJ — Thu, 10 May 2007 21:15:15 GMT

response

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 10 May 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)		I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
	:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)		:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:: I think the [[All rules]] page looks great, and I'm all for the use of Transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] as well. [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 17:15, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

Wooble: /* Transclusion in current ruleset? */ arap

Wooble — Thu, 10 May 2007 18:40:06 GMT

Transclusion in current ruleset?: arap

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:40, 10 May 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	==Transclusion in current ruleset?==		==Transclusion in current ruleset?==
	I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)		I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
		+	:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

Wooble: /* Transclusion in current ruleset? */ oops

Wooble — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:07:38 GMT

Transclusion in current ruleset?: oops

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 30 April 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	==Transclusion in current ruleset?==		==Transclusion in current ruleset?==
-	I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the {{Current ruleset}} page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the {{Current ruleset}} page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)	+	I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

Wooble: on transclusion

Wooble — Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:07:08 GMT

on transclusion

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 30 April 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:
	==Rules and proposal header boxes==		==Rules and proposal header boxes==
	I have created a set of header boxes for rules and proposals. They can be viewed on [[Nomicopolis:Rules and proposals header boxes\|this page]].		I have created a set of header boxes for rules and proposals. They can be viewed on [[Nomicopolis:Rules and proposals header boxes\|this page]].
		+
		+	==Transclusion in current ruleset?==
		+	I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the {{Current ruleset}} page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the {{Current ruleset}} page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)

Admin at 06:02, 7 March 2006

Admin — Tue, 07 Mar 2006 06:02:16 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:02, 7 March 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	==Initial ruleset discussion==		==Initial ruleset discussion==
-	~~There is a multitude of initial rulesets that can be used for the game of Nomic. Careful consideration should be given when deciding to start with one. Here are a few examples:~~	+	Discussion moved [[Nomicapolis:Initial ruleset\|here]].
-		+
-	~~# Peter Suber's Initial Ruleset as listed at http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/writing/nomic.htm#initial%20set~~	+
-	~~# Pure Nomic Ruleset as listed at http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/PureNomicRuleset~~	+
-	~~# Imperial Nomic Ruleset as listed at http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/ImperialNomicRuleset~~	+
-	~~# any others as listed at http://www.nomic.net/~nomicwiki/index.php/NomicVariant~~	+
-	~~# or suggest your own creation listed '''here'''.~~	+
-		+
-	~~===Suggestion 1===~~	+
-	~~====Discussions====~~	+
-	Some minor tweaks should be made before this ruleset could be used. Rule 201 for example should state: Players shall alternate in alphabetical order by username... Or better yet a first-come first-serve alternation. See [[~~User~~:~~Admin/~~Initial ~~Rules\|my take on this~~ ruleset~~]]. [[User:Admin~~\|~~Admin~~]] ~~22:52, 15 February 2006 (PST)~~	+
-		+
-	~~===Suggestion 2===~~	+
-	~~Talk about starting from scratch~~. ~~This might be fun. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 11:23, 17 February 2006 (PST)~~	+
-		+
-	~~===Suggestion 3===~~	+
-	~~Not yet, at least. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 11:23, 17 February 2006 (PST)~~	+

	==Logo Contest==		==Logo Contest==

Admin at 06:05, 6 March 2006

Admin — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 06:05:06 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:05, 6 March 2006
Line 30:		Line 30:
	* User- This namespace would be a metaphor for private property. Users (''i.e. players'') should not edit other user's pages, unless invited to do so. This is their home.		* User- This namespace would be a metaphor for private property. Users (''i.e. players'') should not edit other user's pages, unless invited to do so. This is their home.
	* User talk- This would be the primary means of communicating between users.		* User talk- This would be the primary means of communicating between users.
		+
		+	==Rules and proposal header boxes==
		+	I have created a set of header boxes for rules and proposals. They can be viewed on [[Nomicopolis:Rules and proposals header boxes\|this page]].

Admin at 06:00, 6 March 2006

Admin — Mon, 06 Mar 2006 06:00:56 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:00, 6 March 2006
Line 18:		Line 18:

	===Suggestion 3===		===Suggestion 3===
-	Not yet, at least [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 11:23, 17 February 2006 (PST)	+	Not yet, at least. [[User:Admin\|Admin]] 11:23, 17 February 2006 (PST)

	==Logo Contest==		==Logo Contest==
	We need a logo, if you would like to sumbit one for consideration please upload it and place it on the [[Nomicapolis:Logo contest\|Logo contest]] page.		We need a logo, if you would like to sumbit one for consideration please upload it and place it on the [[Nomicapolis:Logo contest\|Logo contest]] page.
		+
		+	==Suggestions on the uses of namespaces==
		+	This wiki comes with several default namespaces such as Main, Talk, User, Nomicapolis (Project), Image, as well as others. I would like to suggest the following customs for using each namespace.
		+	* Main- This namespace would be used for official game actions and objects, such as rules, proposals and judgments.
		+	* Main talk- This namespace would serve as the place for debate as well as voting for each proposal. It would also include antedotes and links to other pages of similar nature.
		+	* Nomicapolis (Project)- This namespace would be for topics ranged outside of the game itself, but still related to the wiki.
		+	* User- This namespace would be a metaphor for private property. Users (''i.e. players'') should not edit other user's pages, unless invited to do so. This is their home.
		+	* User talk- This would be the primary means of communicating between users.

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:15, 10 May 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)		I'm wondering if it wouldn't make more sense to use transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] page rather than copying and pasting each new rule there; I noticed at least one case where the text on the [[Current ruleset]] page didn't match the text on the actual rule (which happened only after I proposed an amendment to make the rule actually make sense, and later realized that the official form of the rule did make sense but the version in the listing of rules was garbled), and in any case it would be easier. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 13:07, 30 April 2007 (EDT)
	:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)		:As an example of how this would work, I redid the horribly out of date [[All rules]] page using this technique. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:: I think the [[All rules]] page looks great, and I'm all for the use of Transclusion on the [[Current ruleset]] as well. [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 17:15, 10 May 2007 (EDT)