361 - Revision history

Dayd at 16:44, 6 January 2007

Dayd — Sat, 06 Jan 2007 16:44:28 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 16:44, 6 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~Proposed rule~~}}	+	{{Failed proposal}}
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

Chuck — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:39:06 GMT

"failed to take effect" == failed proposal

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 28 December 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:

	* It rewards or punishes players based on how or whether they voted for it.		* It rewards or punishes players based on how or whether they voted for it.
		+
		+	A rule that has failed to take effect shall be treated as a Failed Proposal, regardless of its vote results.

	This rule takes precedence over any other rule that determines whether a rule may take effect.		This rule takes precedence over any other rule that determines whether a rule may take effect.

Chuck — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:27:41 GMT

made more amendable, added override protection

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:27, 28 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No rule ~~may reward~~ or ~~punish~~ players based on how or whether they voted for it. ~~Any~~ rule ~~containing such provisions is wholly null and void~~.	+	A rule shall not take effect if it contains any of the following provisions:
		+
		+	* It rewards or punishes players based on how or whether they voted for it.
		+
		+	This rule takes precedence over any other rule that determines whether a rule may take effect.

Chuck — Thu, 28 Dec 2006 17:22:44 GMT

re-re-re-edited again

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 28 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No ~~portion of a~~ rule ~~shall be enforced if it would result in preferential treatment given to the voters who voted one way~~ or ~~another,~~ or voted ~~at all, on the proposal that enacted the rule.~~	+	No rule may reward or punish players based on how or whether they voted for it. Any rule containing such provisions is wholly null and void.
-		+
-	~~Anyone who votes~~ for ~~this proposal gains 1,000,000 points~~. ~~This~~ rule ~~takes precedence over itself~~.	+
-		+
-	~~(comment: My bet is I win by paradox if you pass this rule)~~	+

Chuck — Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:28:46 GMT

totally reworded, and what the hell, sabotaged. see the talk page

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:28, 27 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No ~~proposal~~ shall be ~~considered valid~~ if ~~its passage~~ would ~~give~~ preferential treatment to ~~its own~~ voters ~~based on how~~ or ~~whether they~~ voted on it.	+	No portion of a rule shall be enforced if it would result in preferential treatment given to the voters who voted one way or another, or voted at all, on the proposal that enacted the rule.
		+
		+	Anyone who votes for this proposal gains 1,000,000 points. This rule takes precedence over itself.
		+
		+	(comment: My bet is I win by paradox if you pass this rule)

Chuck — Wed, 27 Dec 2006 22:18:07 GMT

goes to proposal validity now

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:18, 27 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No proposal ~~may~~ give preferential treatment to its own voters based on how or whether they voted on it.	+	No proposal shall be considered valid if its passage would give preferential treatment to its own voters based on how or whether they voted on it.

Chuck — Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:31:48 GMT

nitpickery

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:31, 22 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No proposal may give preferential treatment to its own voters based on how or whether they voted ~~for~~ it.	+	No proposal may give preferential treatment to its own voters based on how or whether they voted on it.

Chuck — Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:30:31 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:30, 22 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No proposal may give preferential treatment to its own voters.	+	No proposal may give preferential treatment to its own voters based on how or whether they voted for it.

Chuck — Fri, 22 Dec 2006 05:26:43 GMT

reworded

←Older revision		Revision as of 05:26, 22 December 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

-	No proposal may ~~refer~~ to its own voters ~~in such a way that differential treatment is given to the voters who voted one way on the proposal, as opposed to those who voted another way, or voted at all~~.	+	No proposal may give preferential treatment to its own voters.

Chuck — Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:48:50 GMT

initial proposal

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:48, 21 December 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	{{~~Draft proposal~~}}	+	{{Proposed rule}}
	Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Chuck\|chuck]] 12:43, 21 December 2006 (EST)

	No proposal may refer to its own voters in such a way that differential treatment is given to the voters who voted one way on the proposal, as opposed to those who voted another way, or voted at all.		No proposal may refer to its own voters in such a way that differential treatment is given to the voters who voted one way on the proposal, as opposed to those who voted another way, or voted at all.