Talk:385 - Revision history

Wooble: passed

2007-05-10T15:33:25Z

passed

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 10 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	This proposal has passed. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 11:33, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
	Proposed by --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 02:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		Proposed by --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 02:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

Wooble: /* For */ DOn't love the current wording, but it's guaranteed to pass so might as well take the popularity

2007-05-10T13:25:22Z

For: DOn't love the current wording, but it's guaranteed to pass so might as well take the popularity

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:25, 10 May 2007
Line 23:		Line 23:
	# [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 18:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)		# [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 18:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:24, 9 May 2007 (EDT)		# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:24, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
-	# ~~<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->~~	+	# [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 09:25, 10 May 2007 (EDT)

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Tucana25: /* For */ for

2007-05-10T03:24:21Z

For: for

←Older revision		Revision as of 03:24, 10 May 2007
Line 22:		Line 22:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|4\|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|4\|Add FOR vote}}
	# [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 18:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)		# [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 18:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 23:24, 9 May 2007 (EDT)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

BobTHJ: /* For */

2007-05-08T22:26:30Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 8 May 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|4\|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|4\|Add FOR vote}}
		+	# [[User:BobTHJ\|BobTHJ]] 18:26, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|5\|Add AGAINST vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|5\|Add AGAINST vote}}

Wooble: opening voting

2007-05-08T14:03:53Z

opening voting

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:03, 8 May 2007
Line 17:		Line 17:

	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
		+	Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 10:03, 8 May 2007 (EDT)
		+
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|4\|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|4\|Add FOR vote}}

Tucana25: /* Debate */ add my sig as well...

2007-05-01T13:58:03Z

Debate: add my sig as well...

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:58, 1 May 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
	I'd make this proposal explicitly take precedence over the rules it's intended to replace (otherwise most of it will only go into effect if/when they get repealed), and I'd also like to drop the reference to ''stare decisis''. There's a reason that such a policy isn't actually part of American law but rather just a policy of the courts; it binds a judge to follow any precedents that are contrary to the actual wording of the rules. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 09:03, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		I'd make this proposal explicitly take precedence over the rules it's intended to replace (otherwise most of it will only go into effect if/when they get repealed), and I'd also like to drop the reference to ''stare decisis''. There's a reason that such a policy isn't actually part of American law but rather just a policy of the courts; it binds a judge to follow any precedents that are contrary to the actual wording of the rules. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 09:03, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
-	:I agree with the idea about repealing the other rules at the same time, but a while back i tried to do that and it repealed the rule because [[356]] automatically takes that action...so if it looks like this has popular support i will add a proposal to be voted on at the same time. Regarding the stare decisis, I'm cool with that... --[[User:66.41.83.16\|66.41.83.16]] 09:50, 1 May 2007 (EDT)	+	:I agree with the idea about repealing the other rules at the same time, but a while back i tried to do that and it repealed the rule because [[356]] automatically takes that action...so if it looks like this has popular support i will add a proposal to be voted on at the same time. Regarding the stare decisis, I'm cool with that... --[[User:66.41.83.16\|66.41.83.16]] 09:50, 1 May 2007 (EDT) (that was me...--[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 09:58, 1 May 2007 (EDT))
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

66.41.83.16: /* Debate */

2007-05-01T13:50:56Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:50, 1 May 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
	I'd make this proposal explicitly take precedence over the rules it's intended to replace (otherwise most of it will only go into effect if/when they get repealed), and I'd also like to drop the reference to ''stare decisis''. There's a reason that such a policy isn't actually part of American law but rather just a policy of the courts; it binds a judge to follow any precedents that are contrary to the actual wording of the rules. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 09:03, 1 May 2007 (EDT)		I'd make this proposal explicitly take precedence over the rules it's intended to replace (otherwise most of it will only go into effect if/when they get repealed), and I'd also like to drop the reference to ''stare decisis''. There's a reason that such a policy isn't actually part of American law but rather just a policy of the courts; it binds a judge to follow any precedents that are contrary to the actual wording of the rules. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 09:03, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
		+	:I agree with the idea about repealing the other rules at the same time, but a while back i tried to do that and it repealed the rule because [[356]] automatically takes that action...so if it looks like this has popular support i will add a proposal to be voted on at the same time. Regarding the stare decisis, I'm cool with that... --[[User:66.41.83.16\|66.41.83.16]] 09:50, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Wooble: /* Debate */ precedence and stare decisis

2007-05-01T13:03:44Z

Debate: precedence and stare decisis

←Older revision		Revision as of 13:03, 1 May 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|2\|Add comments}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|2\|Add comments}}
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
-		+	I'd make this proposal explicitly take precedence over the rules it's intended to replace (otherwise most of it will only go into effect if/when they get repealed), and I'd also like to drop the reference to ''stare decisis''. There's a reason that such a policy isn't actually part of American law but rather just a policy of the courts; it binds a judge to follow any precedents that are contrary to the actual wording of the rules. [[User:Wooble\|Wooble]] 09:03, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Tucana25: discuss amongst yourselves...let me give you a topic...

2007-05-01T06:59:14Z

discuss amongst yourselves...let me give you a topic...

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:59, 1 May 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	<!--~~BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->~~	+	Proposed by --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 02:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)
-	~~{\| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border~~: ~~5px solid red"~~	+
-	\|-	+
-	\| ~~<big>'''Instructions~~:~~'''</big>~~	+

-	~~This template is intended to be substituted with~~ <~~tt>'''{{subst~~:~~<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki~~>'~~''</tt>~~ and ~~'''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>~~.	+	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
		+	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
		+	Debate shall end for this proposal by May 5, 2007 00:01 EST.

-	~~Please edit this page~~ and ~~replace everything between <tt><nowiki><!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt>~~ and ~~<tt><nowiki><!~~--~~END INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> with the following line~~	+	I've combined rules [[321]], [[328]], and [[363]] as well as provide continuation of a judge if no players vote in a months election...If anyone would like to change anything about the position of 'judge', please let me know and i'll consider its merit. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 02:59, 1 May 2007 (EDT)

-	~~Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 02:51, 1 May 2007 (EDT)</nowiki>~~
-
-	~~Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)~~
-
-	~~<!--~~
-	~~NOTE: When editing, do not use the leading space or the <nowiki> </nowiki> tags. It should only look like this:~~
-
-	~~Proposed by: (four tildes)~~
-
-	~~-->~~
-	~~(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)~~
-	\|}
-	~~<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->~~
-
-	~~<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->~~
-	~~== Proposer's summary and declarations ==~~
	{{editsection\|1\|Proposer's summary}}		{{editsection\|1\|Proposer's summary}}

Tucana25 at 06:51, 1 May 2007

2007-05-01T06:51:00Z

New page

{| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border: 5px solid red"
|-
| <big>'''Instructions:'''</big>

This template is intended to be substituted with <tt>'''{{subst:<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt> and '''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>.

Please edit this page and replace everything between <tt><nowiki></nowiki></tt> and <tt><nowiki></nowiki></tt> with the following line

Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Tucana25|Tucana25]] 02:51, 1 May 2007 (EDT)</nowiki>

Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)


(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)
|}



== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
{{editsection|1|Proposer's summary}}

== Debate ==
{{editsection|2|Add comments}}




== Vote ==
=== For ===
{{editsection|4|Add FOR vote}}
# 

<br />
=== Against ===
{{editsection|5|Add AGAINST vote}}
# 

<br />
=== Abstain ===
{{editsection|6|Add Abstention}}
# 

__NOEDITSECTION__