Talk:369 - Revision history

Dayd at 15:06, 18 January 2007

2007-01-18T15:06:42Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:06, 18 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-		+	I declare this proposal passed --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 10:06, 18 January 2007 (EST)
	Proposed by: [[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 01:53, 12 January 2007 (EST)		Proposed by: [[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 01:53, 12 January 2007 (EST)

Finisterre at 07:31, 17 January 2007

2007-01-17T07:31:36Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 07:31, 17 January 2007
Line 31:		Line 31:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|3\|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|3\|Add FOR vote}}
	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:43, 16 January 2007 (EST)		# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:43, 16 January 2007 (EST)
		+	# --[[User:Finisterre\|Finisterre]] 02:31, 17 January 2007 (EST)
	#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Dayd: Voting open

2007-01-17T02:43:06Z

Voting open

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:43, 17 January 2007
Line 27:		Line 27:

	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
		+	Debate is closed, this proposal must now be voted on --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:43, 16 January 2007 (EST)
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|3\|Add FOR vote}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|3\|Add FOR vote}}
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:43, 16 January 2007 (EST)
		+	#<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Finisterre at 09:13, 13 January 2007

2007-01-13T09:13:21Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:13, 13 January 2007
Line 21:		Line 21:

	I must also confess to being less than enamoured to this proposal too- in a game of NOMIC where the brunt of updating the game wiki lies with the players, rather than a macrobot or a gamemaster, I question the need to willingly introduce more necessary commitments. Even if it would only be tri-monthly, its still one more thing to forget and one more thing to frighten new players away. I'm a NO. --[[User:Finisterre\|Finisterre]] 04:11, 13 January 2007 (EST)		I must also confess to being less than enamoured to this proposal too- in a game of NOMIC where the brunt of updating the game wiki lies with the players, rather than a macrobot or a gamemaster, I question the need to willingly introduce more necessary commitments. Even if it would only be tri-monthly, its still one more thing to forget and one more thing to frighten new players away. I'm a NO. --[[User:Finisterre\|Finisterre]] 04:11, 13 January 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	Ha! My eloquent comment above has been made redundant with the changes I have just noticed Dayd has made. Whoops! I guess I'm a YES now. --[[User:Finisterre\|Finisterre]] 04:13, 13 January 2007 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Finisterre at 09:11, 13 January 2007

2007-01-13T09:11:29Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:11, 13 January 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:

	I don't know how crazy i am about this idea... --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 16:07, 12 January 2007 (EST)		I don't know how crazy i am about this idea... --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 16:07, 12 January 2007 (EST)
		+
		+	I must also confess to being less than enamoured to this proposal too- in a game of NOMIC where the brunt of updating the game wiki lies with the players, rather than a macrobot or a gamemaster, I question the need to willingly introduce more necessary commitments. Even if it would only be tri-monthly, its still one more thing to forget and one more thing to frighten new players away. I'm a NO. --[[User:Finisterre\|Finisterre]] 04:11, 13 January 2007 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd: /* Proposer's summary and declarations */

2007-01-13T02:29:58Z

Proposer's summary and declarations

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:29, 13 January 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==		== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
	{{editsection\|1\|Proposer's summary}}Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 January 2007 (EST) <br>		{{editsection\|1\|Proposer's summary}}Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 January 2007 (EST) <br>
-	This is a proposal to reset the Census page each round thereby getting rid of inactive players.	+	This is a proposal to reset the Census page each round thereby getting rid of inactive players. <br>
		+	Alright so everyone's lazy...I figured as much...In that case I'll change it to my original idea which is "Any player that is not active for a complete round will be removed from the Census at the beginning of the next round." Only problem with this is if there happens to be an extremely short round because someone loopholes. But I suppose that will create less hassle than the way I've proposed. --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 21:29, 12 January 2007 (EST)

	== Debate ==		== Debate ==

Tucana25: /* Debate */

2007-01-12T21:07:52Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 12 January 2007
Line 16:		Line 16:
	Ugh, more bureacracy. How about just dropping players marked inactive and keeping everyone else?		Ugh, more bureacracy. How about just dropping players marked inactive and keeping everyone else?
	(not only forgot to sign, but I seem to have gotten signed out, and I can't recall my password and there's no "forgot password" link. Think we can maybe move to a wiki that isn't so bloody crippled? -- chuck)		(not only forgot to sign, but I seem to have gotten signed out, and I can't recall my password and there's no "forgot password" link. Think we can maybe move to a wiki that isn't so bloody crippled? -- chuck)
		+
		+	I don't know how crazy i am about this idea... --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 16:07, 12 January 2007 (EST)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

67.98.226.13: /* Debate */

2007-01-12T17:39:57Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:39, 12 January 2007
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Ugh, more bureacracy. How about just dropping players marked inactive and keeping everyone else?		Ugh, more bureacracy. How about just dropping players marked inactive and keeping everyone else?
		+	(not only forgot to sign, but I seem to have gotten signed out, and I can't recall my password and there's no "forgot password" link. Think we can maybe move to a wiki that isn't so bloody crippled? -- chuck)

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

67.98.226.13: /* Debate */

2007-01-12T17:38:02Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:38, 12 January 2007
Line 13:		Line 13:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|2\|Add comments}}		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->{{editsection\|2\|Add comments}}
	<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->		<!--BEGIN DEBATE-->
		+
		+	Ugh, more bureacracy. How about just dropping players marked inactive and keeping everyone else?

	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Dayd at 06:56, 12 January 2007

2007-01-12T06:56:08Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 12 January 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS-->
-	~~{\| width="80%" align="center" cellpadding="10" style="border: 5px solid red"~~
-	\|-
-	~~\| <big>'''Instructions:'''</big>~~

-	~~This template is intended to be substituted with <tt>'''{{subst~~:~~<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt> and '''NOT''' just <tt>'''{{<nowiki>vote}}</nowiki>'''</tt>.~~	+	Proposed by: [[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 01:53, 12 January 2007 (EST)

-	~~Please edit this page and replace everything between <tt><nowiki><!--BEGIN INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> and <tt><nowiki><!--END INSTRUCTIONS--></nowiki></tt> with the following line~~
-
-	~~Proposed by: <nowiki>[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 01:53, 12 January 2007 (EST)</nowiki>~~
-
-	~~Also, be sure to place this same line at the beginning of the actual proposal text (this is the discussion page)~~
-
-	~~<!--~~
-	~~NOTE: When editing, do not use the leading space or the <nowiki> </nowiki> tags. It should only look like this:~~
-
-	~~Proposed by: (four tildes)~~
-
-	~~-->~~
-	~~(Due to limitations of the MediaWiki software, this substition cannot be performed automatically)~~
-	\|}
	<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->		<!--END INSTRUCTIONS-->

	<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->		<!--WARNING: Do not add header tags "==" to above this line. Doing so will break the links.-->
	== Proposer's summary and declarations ==		== Proposer's summary and declarations ==
-	{{editsection\|1\|Proposer's summary}}	+	{{editsection\|1\|Proposer's summary}}Debate will end for this proposal at 12:00, 15 January 2007 (EST) <br>
		+	This is a proposal to reset the Census page each round thereby getting rid of inactive players.

	== Debate ==		== Debate ==