Talk:334 - Revision history

Tucana25 at 19:28, 8 December 2006

2006-12-08T19:28:24Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 8 December 2006
Line 33:		Line 33:
	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
	Debate is closed this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:32, 4 December 2006 (EST)		Debate is closed this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:32, 4 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	I declare this proposal approved. --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 14:28, 8 December 2006 (EST)
		+
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
Line 48:		Line 51:
	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 14:04, 6 December 2006 (EST) (my name looks good alone)		# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 14:04, 6 December 2006 (EST) (my name looks good alone)
	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->
		+
		+

	__NOEDITSECTION__		__NOEDITSECTION__

Mike Rosoft: Voting for proposal 334

2006-12-07T17:29:25Z

Voting for proposal 334

←Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 7 December 2006
Line 39:		Line 39:
	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 01:46, 5 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 01:46, 5 December 2006 (EST)
	# [[User:Chuck\|Chuck]] 14:42, 6 December 2006 (EST)		# [[User:Chuck\|Chuck]] 14:42, 6 December 2006 (EST)
		+	#[[User:Mike Rosoft\|Mike Rosoft]] 12:29, 7 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Chuck: /* For */

2006-12-06T19:42:06Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:42, 6 December 2006
Line 38:		Line 38:
	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:54, 4 December 2006 (EST)		# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:54, 4 December 2006 (EST)
	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 01:46, 5 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 01:46, 5 December 2006 (EST)
		+	# [[User:Chuck\|Chuck]] 14:42, 6 December 2006 (EST)
	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->		# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

Dayd: /* Against */

2006-12-06T19:04:20Z

Against

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:04, 6 December 2006
Line 44:		Line 44:
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# --[[User:Dayd\|Dayd]] 14:04, 6 December 2006 (EST) (my name looks good alone)
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	__NOEDITSECTION__		__NOEDITSECTION__

Tucana25: /* For */

2006-12-05T06:46:07Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 5 December 2006
Line 37:		Line 37:
	# --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:29, 4 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:29, 4 December 2006 (EST)
	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:54, 4 December 2006 (EST)		# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:54, 4 December 2006 (EST)
-	#	+	# --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 01:46, 5 December 2006 (EST)
-	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

2006-12-04T20:03:46Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 4 December 2006
Line 28:		Line 28:
	Before I vote, I was wondering if anyone could give me some feedback on rule [[326]]. As of right now the statement declaring that a vote shall end at date and time is meaningless. Also, calling an election based on all registered voters includes inactive voters so I don't foresee any time in the near future when we will get 1/2 of all registered voters being involved. I would also like to see the '24 hour' rule on closing a vote be extended to 48 hours. Assuming this amendment is approved, is there any opinion on amending [[326]] in the future? --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 13:39, 4 December 2006 (EST)		Before I vote, I was wondering if anyone could give me some feedback on rule [[326]]. As of right now the statement declaring that a vote shall end at date and time is meaningless. Also, calling an election based on all registered voters includes inactive voters so I don't foresee any time in the near future when we will get 1/2 of all registered voters being involved. I would also like to see the '24 hour' rule on closing a vote be extended to 48 hours. Assuming this amendment is approved, is there any opinion on amending [[326]] in the future? --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 13:39, 4 December 2006 (EST)

-	:Let's move this discussion to [[Game ~~Direction~~]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 15:03, 4 December 2006 (EST)	+	:Let's move this discussion to [[Game-direction]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 15:03, 4 December 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Applejuicefool: /* Debate */

2006-12-04T20:03:17Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:03, 4 December 2006
Line 27:		Line 27:

	Before I vote, I was wondering if anyone could give me some feedback on rule [[326]]. As of right now the statement declaring that a vote shall end at date and time is meaningless. Also, calling an election based on all registered voters includes inactive voters so I don't foresee any time in the near future when we will get 1/2 of all registered voters being involved. I would also like to see the '24 hour' rule on closing a vote be extended to 48 hours. Assuming this amendment is approved, is there any opinion on amending [[326]] in the future? --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 13:39, 4 December 2006 (EST)		Before I vote, I was wondering if anyone could give me some feedback on rule [[326]]. As of right now the statement declaring that a vote shall end at date and time is meaningless. Also, calling an election based on all registered voters includes inactive voters so I don't foresee any time in the near future when we will get 1/2 of all registered voters being involved. I would also like to see the '24 hour' rule on closing a vote be extended to 48 hours. Assuming this amendment is approved, is there any opinion on amending [[326]] in the future? --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 13:39, 4 December 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	:Let's move this discussion to [[Game Direction]]. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 15:03, 4 December 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Tucana25: /* Debate */

2006-12-04T18:39:52Z

Debate

←Older revision		Revision as of 18:39, 4 December 2006
Line 25:		Line 25:

	: Okay, I get it now. Thanks for the explanation. And yes, I believe that fixes the loophole. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 13:54, 28 November 2006 (EST)		: Okay, I get it now. Thanks for the explanation. And yes, I believe that fixes the loophole. [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 13:54, 28 November 2006 (EST)
		+
		+	Before I vote, I was wondering if anyone could give me some feedback on rule [[326]]. As of right now the statement declaring that a vote shall end at date and time is meaningless. Also, calling an election based on all registered voters includes inactive voters so I don't foresee any time in the near future when we will get 1/2 of all registered voters being involved. I would also like to see the '24 hour' rule on closing a vote be extended to 48 hours. Assuming this amendment is approved, is there any opinion on amending [[326]] in the future? --[[User:Tucana25\|Tucana25]] 13:39, 4 December 2006 (EST)
	<!--END DEBATE-->		<!--END DEBATE-->

Applejuicefool: /* For */

2006-12-04T15:54:10Z

For

←Older revision		Revision as of 15:54, 4 December 2006
Line 32:		Line 32:
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]
	# --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:29, 4 December 2006 (EST)		# --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:29, 4 December 2006 (EST)
-	# <!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->	+	# [[User:Applejuicefool\|Applejuicefool]] 10:54, 4 December 2006 (EST)
		+	#
		+	<!--ADD YOUR NAME HERE-->

	<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />		<!--DO NOT REMOVE--><br />
		+
	=== Against ===		=== Against ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=5 Add AGAINST vote]

TomFoolery at 12:33, 4 December 2006

2006-12-04T12:33:39Z

←Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 4 December 2006
Line 28:		Line 28:

	== Vote ==		== Vote ==
-	Debate is closed~~, please vote~~. --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:32, 4 December 2006 (EST)	+	Debate is closed this proposal must now be voted on. --[[User:TomFoolery\|TomFoolery]] 07:32, 4 December 2006 (EST)
	=== For ===		=== For ===
	<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]		<!--DO NOT REMOVE-->[http://www.editthis.info/Nomicapolis/index.php?title={{NAMESPACE}}:{{PAGENAME}}&action=edit&section=4 Add FOR vote]