|
|
| (57 intermediate revisions not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| - | In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed ahead of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and described American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed communities in a fashion similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know concerning the rape and torture component, but I do know that every time I took off on a mission in Vietnam I m...
| + | <p>Today the Internet is changing the way people interact and it is having an impact on committed relationships. People are chatting, flirting, and even cheating online. The internet permits many to live out their fantasies. They can do and say what they cannot in real face-to-face encounters. This sort of behavior can destroy relationships.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | I am a war felony. Yes, you heard correctlya war prison! I want to explain why.
| + | <p>Most women would agree. The consensus being that over the course of time a connection may develop between the online cheaters. Even if they never meet in person, they are sharing intimacies and sexual fantasies that should only be shared with their partner.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed prior to the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and pictured American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed communities in a trend similar to Genghis Khan. I dont know about the rape and torture portion, but I do know that each time I took off on a vision in Vietnam I made a sacred promise that any Viet Cong or North Vietnam Army gift I caught approaching or wanting to wait our soldiers on the floor would definitely endure a lot of pain and probably lose his life. Is that any unique of razing a village where insurgents put throughout the day and launched problems at night? I dont think therefore. When I see it, if the Americans who fought so valiantly on the floor during the Vietnam War are war criminals, then so am I.
| + | <p>Besides, many feel that as their men become more entangled in the online affair, the possibilities for offline cheating increases.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | Without problem, John Kerrys depiction of American soldiers terrorists, and the opponent as victims of a barbaric U.S. military which tortures and killings helpless civilians was extremely common with the likes of Jane Fonda and other members of the anti-war motion, and at the same time, launched a long and effective political job which culminated with his defeated bid for the presidency.
| + | <p>When confronted about the possibilities of developing emotional attachments, many men indicated that more often than not, emotions are faked. Let’s face it, just because someone puts up a smiley face doesn’t mean they are really smiling.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | But 1971 was quite a while ago. Is it vital that people discuss this matter now? For a special band of American heroes it is more essential than actually, simply because they need to set the record straight. I am discussing people who were captured and kept as prisoners of war. In 1971, quite a few POWs were residing in conditions of amazing depravation in camps with euphemistic names just Like The Hanoi Hilton, and The Zoo. It was a life of misery, where torture and beatings were everyday ticket and many died of misery and illness.
| + | <p>It seems that when it comes to cyber cheating, it may come down to a person’s point of view. Partners will have to agree on what is appropriate and what is not appropriate Internet behavior. Where as one partner might consider online flirting as harmless fun. Others might consider this behavior just as harmful as a midnight romp in a hotel.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | Most POWs never expected to be freedespecially since their captors told them they would in the course of time be tried and completed for their war crimes. Imagine their despair when one of their own told the planet which they were war thieves. The North Vietnamese government could not have called for a much better advertising adviser than John Kerry!
| + | <p>Interestingly, studies indicate that one might critic their partner’s online amorous advances more severely than their own. When I do, it is okay, but when you do, it is not. Anyway you chop it up, Internet flirting is a real issue. To address this, couples should discuss what they think is and isn’t online cheating. Although cyber cheating may seem more innocent to some, it can still ruin a relationship.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | I thought I'd never say this, but here goesthank God we live in a litigious community! A small grouping of POWs, veterans, and other like-minded individuals have established a company named Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF).
| + | <p>The bottom line, if you are flirting with someone online behind your partner’s back, you are being deceptive. If you are honest about your online hanky-panky, and your partner is uncomfortable, insecure or outright hurt by it, maybe you should stop. That is, if you cherish your relationship.</p> |
| - | | + | <p> </p> |
| - | The inspiration recently filed a lawsuit for Carlton A. Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter, against Kenneth T. Campbell and Jon Bjornson, two contacts and helps of Kerrys through the 2004 presidential plan, both of whom are Vietnam Veterans and original anti-war activists. The basis of the suit is too difficult to explain here, but you may study everything on the VVLF website, that will be In summary, Mister Sherwood created a documentary entitled Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. The video was never seen since Sinclair Broadcasting Companythe only community bold enough to air the documentarywas power to withdraw after Kerry colleagues confronted them with libel matches and even loss of their transmission permit. If the law suit proceeds as planned, details of this energy, plus Kerrys action in 1971 will undoubtedly be mentioned in available judge and become a matter of public report. And when that happens, a lot of liberals and antiwar activists will be really disappointed.
| + | <p> </p> |
| - | | + | |
| - | I'm no activist, much less a philanthropist. As a subject of fact, I am virtually a political independent. But fair is fair, and when I realized that the VVLF is struggling to finance this extremely important and historical lawsuit I reached for my billfold and set my profit the container. You may do as you want, but I believe that as a, every American should go to the VVLF web site and pay attention to their area of the history. Their the best move to make. Once more, their web site is In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry testified before the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and portrayed American troops as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed communities in a manner reminiscent of Genghis Khan. I dont know in regards to the rape and pain component, but I do know that each time I took off on a goal in Vietnam I m...
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | I am a war felony. Yes, you heard correctlya war offender! I want to explain why.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | In 1971, then Lt. (j.g.) John Kerry claimed ahead of the U.S. Senate Foreign Relations Committee and described American soldiers as murderers, rapists and torturers who ravaged the countryside of South Vietnam. . . [and] razed villages in a trend reminiscent of Genghis Khan. I dont know concerning the rape and pain part, but I do know that everytime I became popular on a vision in Vietnam I made a sacred promise that any Viet Cong or North Vietnam Army soldier I caught attacking or trying to ambush our soldiers on the ground would definitely suffer lots of pain and probably lose his life. Is that any unique of razing a town where insurgents hid throughout the day and released problems at night? I dont think therefore. As I notice it, if the Americans who fought so valiantly on a lawn through the Vietnam War are war thieves, then so am I.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | Without question, John Kerrys characterization of American soldiers terrorists, and the opponent as subjects of a crude U.S. military which tortures and murders helpless civilians was extremely popular with the likes of Jane Fonda and other members of the anti-war activity, and at the same time, presented a long and effective political job which culminated with his lost bid for the presidency.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | But 1971 was quite a while before. Can it be important that we examine this dilemma now? For a unique number of American heros it's more important than ever, because they need certainly to set the history right. I'm discussing those who were caught and placed as prisoners of war. In 1971, many of our POWs were residing in conditions of amazing depravation in camps with euphemistic names just Like The Hanoi Hilton, and The Zoo. It was a life of agony, where torture and beatings were daily ticket and several died of starvation and condition.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | Most POWs never expected to be freedespecially since their captors told them which they could in the course of time be tried and executed because of their war violations. Imagine their despair when among their own told the entire world that they were war criminals. The North Vietnamese government could not have asked for a better press adviser than John Kerry!
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | I thought I would never say this, but here goesthank God we are now living in a litigious community! Several POWs, experts, and other like-minded residents have formed a business called Vietnam Veterans Legacy Foundation (VVLF).
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | The building blocks recently recorded case on behalf of Carlton A. Sherwood, a Pulitzer Prize-winning writer, against Kenneth J. Campbell and Jon Bjornson, two contacts and aides of Kerrys throughout the 2004 presidential plan, both of whom are Vietnam Veterans and longtime anti-war activists. The cornerstone of the match is too complex to spell it out here, however, you can read all the details on the VVLF website, which is In a nutshell, Mister Sherwood created a documentary titled Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal. The video was never seen since Sinclair Broadcasting Companythe only network heroic enough to air the documentarywas pressure to withdraw after Kerry colleagues confronted them with libel matches and also lack of their transmission permit. If regulations suit proceeds as in the offing, facts of this work, plus Kerrys exercise in 1971 is going to be discussed in open court and become a subject of public report. And when that occurs, plenty of liberals and antiwar activists are likely to be very unhappy.
| + | |
| - | | + | |
| - | I'm not an activist, significantly less a philanthropist. As a matter of fact, I'm just about a political independent. But fair is fair, and when I learned that the VVLF is struggling to fund this very important and famous litigation I achieved for my billfold and set my money in the marijuana. You can do as you want, but I think that as a, every American is going to the VVLF website and pay attention to their side of the story. Its the proper thing to do. Yet again, their website is
| + | |
Today the Internet is changing the way people interact and it is having an impact on committed relationships. People are chatting, flirting, and even cheating online. The internet permits many to live out their fantasies. They can do and say what they cannot in real face-to-face encounters. This sort of behavior can destroy relationships.
Most women would agree. The consensus being that over the course of time a connection may develop between the online cheaters. Even if they never meet in person, they are sharing intimacies and sexual fantasies that should only be shared with their partner.
Besides, many feel that as their men become more entangled in the online affair, the possibilities for offline cheating increases.
When confronted about the possibilities of developing emotional attachments, many men indicated that more often than not, emotions are faked. Let’s face it, just because someone puts up a smiley face doesn’t mean they are really smiling.
It seems that when it comes to cyber cheating, it may come down to a person’s point of view. Partners will have to agree on what is appropriate and what is not appropriate Internet behavior. Where as one partner might consider online flirting as harmless fun. Others might consider this behavior just as harmful as a midnight romp in a hotel.
Interestingly, studies indicate that one might critic their partner’s online amorous advances more severely than their own. When I do, it is okay, but when you do, it is not. Anyway you chop it up, Internet flirting is a real issue. To address this, couples should discuss what they think is and isn’t online cheating. Although cyber cheating may seem more innocent to some, it can still ruin a relationship.
The bottom line, if you are flirting with someone online behind your partner’s back, you are being deceptive. If you are honest about your online hanky-panky, and your partner is uncomfortable, insecure or outright hurt by it, maybe you should stop. That is, if you cherish your relationship.
