Talk:Main Page
From Inselkampf
(Difference between revisions)
Headphones (Talk | contribs) (Screen width guidelines) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT) | * You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" [[User:Ingenious|Ingenious]] 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT) | ||
** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | ** I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --[[User:DCJoeDog|DCJoeDog]] 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Screen width guidelines == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons? Pages like the [[Gold Mine]] run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so. This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully. Do we care? If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --[[User:Headphones|Headphones]] 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 19:24, 17 October 2007
Is it worth forcing people to register and log in to make changes?
It would be a pain, but seems like it has become necessary with all the little kids on the net these days.
- You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" Ingenious 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
- I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --DCJoeDog 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
Screen width guidelines
Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons? Pages like the Gold Mine run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so. This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully. Do we care? If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --Headphones 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
