Talk:Main Page

From Inselkampf

(Difference between revisions)
(Screen width guidelines)
(Screen width guidelines)
Line 9: Line 9:
Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons?  Pages like the [[Gold Mine]] run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so.  This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully.  Do we care?  If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --[[User:Headphones|Headphones]] 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons?  Pages like the [[Gold Mine]] run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so.  This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully.  Do we care?  If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --[[User:Headphones|Headphones]] 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
* Yeah, you got me on that one as well, I see what you mean, although I don't know anyone who uses a resolution lower than 1024 these days, so it may not be as big a deal as you may think--[[User:DCJoeDog|DCJoeDog]] 19:43, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:43, 17 October 2007

Is it worth forcing people to register and log in to make changes?

It would be a pain, but seems like it has become necessary with all the little kids on the net these days.

  • You probably should seeing as everything says "have anal sex!" Ingenious 17:59, 26 August 2007 (EDT)
    • I reverted everything that vandal had done to the world two wikis here --DCJoeDog 14:59, 7 September 2007 (EDT)

Screen width guidelines

Are we shooting for any specific screen width for view-ability reasons? Pages like the Gold Mine run into bad formatting business if the viewing window is thinner than 1000 pixels or so. This seems to be a problem mainly because the Prerequisites template runs into the window content, and they overlap ungracefully. Do we care? If there was a minimum width left for the content that the template wouldn't encroach upon (say 460-480 pixels?) this might help, but my kung-fu is not strong in this department. --Headphones 15:24, 17 October 2007 (EDT)

  • Yeah, you got me on that one as well, I see what you mean, although I don't know anyone who uses a resolution lower than 1024 these days, so it may not be as big a deal as you may think--DCJoeDog 19:43, 17 October 2007 (EDT)
Personal tools