Talk:New Player Support - Revision history

DCJoeDog: /* Name Expiration */

DCJoeDog — Tue, 09 Oct 2007 09:05:22 GMT

Name Expiration

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 9 October 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)		Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
	:Agreed. I'll remove the old ones. - [[User:Aegreen\|Aegreen]] 16:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)		:Agreed. I'll remove the old ones. - [[User:Aegreen\|Aegreen]] 16:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
		+	:More old names removed--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 05:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)

Aegreen — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:48:18 GMT

Name Expiration

←Older revision		Revision as of 20:48, 13 September 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)		Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
		+	:Agreed. I'll remove the old ones. - [[User:Aegreen\|Aegreen]] 16:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)

DCJoeDog — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:38:41 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 9 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	== World confusion ==
		+
	I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?		I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?
	*I will add one, as I too assume this is a W1 only list--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 15:32, 7 September 2007 (EDT)		*I will add one, as I too assume this is a W1 only list--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 15:32, 7 September 2007 (EDT)

DCJoeDog — Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:38:05 GMT

Name Expiration

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:38, 9 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?		I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?
	*I will add one, as I too assume this is a W1 only list--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 15:32, 7 September 2007 (EDT)		*I will add one, as I too assume this is a W1 only list--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 15:32, 7 September 2007 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Name Expiration ==
		+
		+	Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)

DCJoeDog — Fri, 07 Sep 2007 19:32:17 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 7 September 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~¡xǝs lɐuɐ ǝʌɐɥ~~	+	I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?
		+	*I will add one, as I too assume this is a W1 only list--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 15:32, 7 September 2007 (EDT)

¡xǝs lɐuɐ ǝʌɐɥ — Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:49:21 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 02:49, 23 August 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?~~	+	¡xǝs lɐuɐ ǝʌɐɥ

154.20.4.94 — Sun, 03 Jun 2007 06:58:50 GMT

New page

I assume this is only for world 1. Should there be a second header for world 2?

←Older revision		Revision as of 09:05, 9 October 2007
Line 8:		Line 8:
	Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)		Should there be a limit to how long a name should be left on the list? I say one month is enough.--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 17:38, 9 September 2007 (EDT)
	:Agreed. I'll remove the old ones. - [[User:Aegreen\|Aegreen]] 16:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)		:Agreed. I'll remove the old ones. - [[User:Aegreen\|Aegreen]] 16:48, 13 September 2007 (EDT)
		+	:More old names removed--[[User:DCJoeDog\|DCJoeDog]] 05:05, 9 October 2007 (EDT)