<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://72.14.177.54/skins/common/feed.css?207"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Syntax and Semantics - Revision history</title>
		<link>http://72.14.177.54/GEB/?title=Syntax_and_Semantics&amp;action=history</link>
		<description>Revision history for this page on the wiki</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.15.1</generator>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 11:06:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<item>
			<title>68.40.187.71 at 02:12, 20 April 2006</title>
			<link>http://72.14.177.54/GEB/?title=Syntax_and_Semantics&amp;diff=1318&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

		&lt;table style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-marker' /&gt;
		&lt;col class='diff-content' /&gt;
		&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
		&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;←Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;td colspan='2' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 02:12, 20 April 2006&lt;/td&gt;
		&lt;/tr&gt;
		&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 4:&lt;/td&gt;
&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot; class=&quot;diff-lineno&quot;&gt;Line 4:&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Does anyone know if post-SHRDLU AI work has continued to parse sentences using both syntax and semantics simultaneously as Winograd describes?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt; &lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;Does anyone know if post-SHRDLU AI work has continued to parse sentences using both syntax and semantics simultaneously as Winograd describes?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;tr&gt;&lt;td colspan=&quot;2&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td class='diff-marker'&gt;+&lt;/td&gt;&lt;td style=&quot;background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;&quot;&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ins style=&quot;color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;&quot;&gt;-Aaron Stark&lt;/ins&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/td&gt;&lt;/tr&gt;
&lt;!-- diff generator: internal 2026-06-14 11:06:26 --&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:12:38 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>68.40.187.71</dc:creator>			<comments>http://72.14.177.54/GEB/Talk:Syntax_and_Semantics</comments>		</item>
		<item>
			<title>68.40.187.71 at 02:12, 20 April 2006</title>
			<link>http://72.14.177.54/GEB/?title=Syntax_and_Semantics&amp;diff=1317&amp;oldid=prev</link>
			<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;In this section, Hofstadter is (via Winograd) taking an implicit dig at generative-linguist theories that posit separate mental modules for syntax and semantics. This is all well and good, and there is evidence for both the Hofstadter/Winograd position, and for the separate module theory (I'm a bit out of the cogsci/linguistics loop, and I don't know if there have been slam dunks for one or the other position in the past five years). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'm finding it annoying, however, that Hofstadter presents Winograd's comments on SHRDLU as if they are final proof for a unified syntax/semantics in natural language (&amp;quot;It is extremely interesting that in natural language, syntax and semantics are so deeply intertwined. ... But here, Winograd is telling us that-- at least when the usual sense of 'syntax' and 'semantics' are taken-- they merge right into each other, in natural language.&amp;quot; (p. 631)). This is just one AI program-- albeit an apparently fairly successful one-- and there's no way that a single program can prove such a huge result about natural language in the human mind. (Also, I think that one could make still make a case for separate modules that are used simultaneously-- as Winograd describes-- in language processing).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Does anyone know if post-SHRDLU AI work has continued to parse sentences using both syntax and semantics simultaneously as Winograd describes?&lt;/div&gt;</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 02:12:18 GMT</pubDate>			<dc:creator>68.40.187.71</dc:creator>			<comments>http://72.14.177.54/GEB/Talk:Syntax_and_Semantics</comments>		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>