CW8:7742 - Revision history

Instructor Bob: graded

Instructor Bob — Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:36:39 GMT

graded

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:36, 3 April 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
		+	{{Graded}}
	Smart growth vs. sprawl		Smart growth vs. sprawl
-		+	{{OK}}
	a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.		a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.
		+	{{OK}}
	b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.		b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.

	Management Plan		Management Plan
-		+	{{OK}}
	c) The emphasis on helping save the few remaining species in the Bay area.		c) The emphasis on helping save the few remaining species in the Bay area.
		+	{{OK}}
	d)Both sides are having problems giving up anything. The public wants to enjoy the parks but don't want to help clean them up or be responsible for the welfare of the parks and animals living in them.		d)Both sides are having problems giving up anything. The public wants to enjoy the parks but don't want to help clean them up or be responsible for the welfare of the parks and animals living in them.
		+	{{OK}}
	e)No. The solution is too little, too late they should have done something 20 years ago when the first signs were noticable of degradation of the parks.		e)No. The solution is too little, too late they should have done something 20 years ago when the first signs were noticable of degradation of the parks.

Jalcst-7742 at 21:33, 31 March 2006

Jalcst-7742 — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:33:30 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:33, 31 March 2006
Line 3:		Line 3:
	a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.		a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.
	b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.		b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.
		+
		+	Management Plan
		+
		+	c) The emphasis on helping save the few remaining species in the Bay area.
		+	d)Both sides are having problems giving up anything. The public wants to enjoy the parks but don't want to help clean them up or be responsible for the welfare of the parks and animals living in them.
		+	e)No. The solution is too little, too late they should have done something 20 years ago when the first signs were noticable of degradation of the parks.

Jalcst-7742 at 21:12, 31 March 2006

Jalcst-7742 — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:12:18 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:12, 31 March 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.		a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.
		+	b) We should use the space of buisnesses that have closed down if possible and just improve the existing building don't just put up another store across town when the existing one is doing well.

Jalcst-7742 at 21:07, 31 March 2006

Jalcst-7742 — Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:07:35 GMT

New page

Smart growth vs. sprawl

a) The increase of the size of cities and suburbs and the destruction of ecosystems in the name of progress.