CW6 1592 - Revision history

174.59.74.190: z91pxz Well, actually, a lot of what you write is not quite true !... well, okay, it does not matter:D

174.59.74.190 — Wed, 28 Sep 2011 06:03:25 GMT

z91pxz Well, actually, a lot of what you write is not quite true !... well, okay, it does not matter:D

←Older revision		Revision as of 06:03, 28 September 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~{{Graded}}~~	+	z91pxz Well, actually, a lot of what you write is not quite true !... well, okay, it does not matter:D
-	~~===Hurricanes vs. Homes==={{OK}}~~	+
-		+
-	a~~. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most~~ of ~~it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward~~ you ~~go, the less populous the country~~ is. ~~Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works~~. ~~It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage~~. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. It is costing tax payers and the government a lot of money, but there is no way to prevent hurricanes. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it ~~wouldn't be right because it's~~ not ~~their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.~~	+
-		+
-	~~===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning==={{OK}}~~	+
-		+
-	b. The article is for China getting new technologies because of its growing economy. The methods that are being used right now are causing damage and there need to find ways to get the same amount of energy they are while hurting the environment less. They are having to expand farther and farther to get the oil that they need for their huge economy. However, if they keep getting it from other places, there someday won't be enough for the entire world and when we run out we run out. They have to find a way that they can't get what they need without causing potential harm on the rest of the world.	+

Instructor Bob: graded

Instructor Bob — Wed, 29 Mar 2006 14:54:07 GMT

graded

←Older revision		Revision as of 14:54, 29 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	===Hurricanes vs. Homes===	+	{{Graded}}
		+	===Hurricanes vs. Homes==={{OK}}

	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. It is costing tax payers and the government a lot of money, but there is no way to prevent hurricanes. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.		a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. It is costing tax payers and the government a lot of money, but there is no way to prevent hurricanes. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.

-	===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===	+	===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning==={{OK}}

	b. The article is for China getting new technologies because of its growing economy. The methods that are being used right now are causing damage and there need to find ways to get the same amount of energy they are while hurting the environment less. They are having to expand farther and farther to get the oil that they need for their huge economy. However, if they keep getting it from other places, there someday won't be enough for the entire world and when we run out we run out. They have to find a way that they can't get what they need without causing potential harm on the rest of the world.		b. The article is for China getting new technologies because of its growing economy. The methods that are being used right now are causing damage and there need to find ways to get the same amount of energy they are while hurting the environment less. They are having to expand farther and farther to get the oil that they need for their huge economy. However, if they keep getting it from other places, there someday won't be enough for the entire world and when we run out we run out. They have to find a way that they can't get what they need without causing potential harm on the rest of the world.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:32, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:32:50 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:32, 10 March 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===		===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===

-	b. The article is for China getting new technologies because of its growing economy. The methods that are being used right now are causing damage and there need to find ways to get the same amount of energy they are while hurting the environment less. They are having to expand farther and farther to get the oil that they need for their huge economy. However, is they keep getting it from other places, there won't be enough for the entire world and when we run out we run out.	+	b. The article is for China getting new technologies because of its growing economy. The methods that are being used right now are causing damage and there need to find ways to get the same amount of energy they are while hurting the environment less. They are having to expand farther and farther to get the oil that they need for their huge economy. However, if they keep getting it from other places, there someday won't be enough for the entire world and when we run out we run out. They have to find a way that they can't get what they need without causing potential harm on the rest of the world.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:31, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:31:45 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:31, 10 March 2006
Line 5:		Line 5:
	===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===		===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===

-	a.	+	b. The article is for China getting new technologies because of its growing economy. The methods that are being used right now are causing damage and there need to find ways to get the same amount of energy they are while hurting the environment less. They are having to expand farther and farther to get the oil that they need for their huge economy. However, is they keep getting it from other places, there won't be enough for the entire world and when we run out we run out.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:23, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:23:09 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:23, 10 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Hurricanes vs. Homes===		===Hurricanes vs. Homes===

-	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.	+	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. It is costing tax payers and the government a lot of money, but there is no way to prevent hurricanes. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.

	===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===		===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===

	a.		a.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:22, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:22:06 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:22, 10 March 2006
Line 2:		Line 2:

	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.		a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.
		+
		+	===China Makes Stable Energy Supplies Top Priority for Economic Planning===
		+
		+	a.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:20, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:20:53 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 10 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Hurricanes vs. Homes===		===Hurricanes vs. Homes===

-	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time.	+	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time. There could be a few bad years where tornadoes occur a bunch and that would cause just as much damage. Hurricanes just happen to occur more often and hit harder. There isn't much to do about it. The people there should just pay higher taxes on there land. There are so many people that live on the coasts, we wouldn't have anywhere to put them is we said they couldn't build there anymore. Plus, it wouldn't be right because it's not their fault. It's just something that has to be dealt with.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:16, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:16:38 GMT

←Older revision		Revision as of 21:16, 10 March 2006
Line 1:		Line 1:
	===Hurricanes vs. Homes===		===Hurricanes vs. Homes===

-	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast.	+	a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast. Most of it is talking about the downside and only the very last part is an upside to rebuilding on the coast. The coastlines have most of the population in the United States. The more inward you go, the less populous the country is. Hurricanes are just part of how the environment works. It would be like saying that we shouldn't be able to rebuild here because a tornado caused a lot of damage. The coast just gets unlucky and happens to get hit all the time.

Jalcst-1592 at 21:11, 10 March 2006

Jalcst-1592 — Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:11:14 GMT

New page

===Hurricanes vs. Homes===

a. It seems like the article is against rebuilding on the coast.