User talk:RobKohr
From Create Your Own Story
(→Can you re-upload all the files on this wiki?) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
All the files on this wiki have lost their content after you re-named this wiki. When I was [[User:GreatGrapes4330|GreatGrapes4330]] on this wiki, they appeared, but after you re-named this wiki, they're all gone, so can you re-upload or [[User:Platypus|Platypus]] can do it? | All the files on this wiki have lost their content after you re-named this wiki. When I was [[User:GreatGrapes4330|GreatGrapes4330]] on this wiki, they appeared, but after you re-named this wiki, they're all gone, so can you re-upload or [[User:Platypus|Platypus]] can do it? | ||
--[[User:Newman2|Newman2]] 20:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)---- | --[[User:Newman2|Newman2]] 20:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | == "Pedo Stories" and Legality == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Allow me to quote another user here: | ||
| + | |||
| + | "You are totally wrong about written descriptions of underage sex being illegal. The fact that the material could be considered obscene, and thus illegal (in the US) would actually apply equally to any story with any extreme sexual activity. It can be applied to rape, bestiality, and just about ANY story that contains sexual descriptions. It is based on a remnant of a struck down child protection law that was unconstitutional, which is why it is sited for material directly related to children. The law is laughable, and you may have found one of the few cases where it was actually used, and the only one that I am aware of that actually made it through successfully. The user who pointed it out to you must be a free speech hating Nazi to bring up such an unlikely and remote senario as based on such a law. If this law were actually a problem, the largest sex story site on the internet www.asstr.org would not exist. No reasonable court would rule that you are guilty of transporting obscenity for something someone else wrote on your website. I'm not trying to tell you how to run your site, but if the "no pedo stories" rule stands; I will be leaving." | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''--[[User:BakaG|BakaG]] 07:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)''' | ||
Revision as of 07:06, 26 September 2015
On my atom kid story some one added get a drum set could you delete that (and mabey read the rest of the story and give it a rating.) Djf2014 10:05, 18 August 2006 (EDT)
Can you re-upload all the files on this wiki?
All the files on this wiki have lost their content after you re-named this wiki. When I was GreatGrapes4330 on this wiki, they appeared, but after you re-named this wiki, they're all gone, so can you re-upload or Platypus can do it? --Newman2 20:45, 25 July 2012 (UTC)----
"Pedo Stories" and Legality
Allow me to quote another user here:
"You are totally wrong about written descriptions of underage sex being illegal. The fact that the material could be considered obscene, and thus illegal (in the US) would actually apply equally to any story with any extreme sexual activity. It can be applied to rape, bestiality, and just about ANY story that contains sexual descriptions. It is based on a remnant of a struck down child protection law that was unconstitutional, which is why it is sited for material directly related to children. The law is laughable, and you may have found one of the few cases where it was actually used, and the only one that I am aware of that actually made it through successfully. The user who pointed it out to you must be a free speech hating Nazi to bring up such an unlikely and remote senario as based on such a law. If this law were actually a problem, the largest sex story site on the internet www.asstr.org would not exist. No reasonable court would rule that you are guilty of transporting obscenity for something someone else wrote on your website. I'm not trying to tell you how to run your site, but if the "no pedo stories" rule stands; I will be leaving."
--BakaG 07:06, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
